Sep 2026· Advanced Robotics· pp. 1-20· 59 references
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Abstract
Human preferences are often ill-defined and shaped by contextual and situational factors, posing challenges for effective human–robot interaction. Social Assistive Robots can address this by employing adaptive, context-aware persuasive strategies to better elicit user preferences and support healthier behaviors. In this study, we investigated how a Pepper robot, equipped with a Large Language Model-driven dialog system and a trait-based persuasion model, could estimate user profiles and tailor strategies for preference elicitation and persuasion. In particular, the robot was deployed in a simulated home environment to offer snack options and encourage participants toward healthier choices. System performance was assessed using the Persuasive Robot Acceptance Model, an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model that incorporates social dimensions such as trust, liking, compliance, and psychological reactance. This work is presented as a system-integration contribution, focusing on evaluating the perceptual impact and operational robustness of the integrated framework in a realistic HRI setting, rather than isolating the causal contribution of individual personalization components. Results revealed statistically significant differences (p<0.05, p<0.01) in user impressions across gender, technological experience, and motivation groups. However, no significant differences were observed with respect to trait-based profiles (trust propensity, compliance awareness), suggesting either effective adaptivity of the system or a stronger influence of demographic factors. These findings underscore the importance of adaptive, user-sensitive design in social assistive robots to foster equitable, engaging, and effective persuasion across diverse user groups.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The findings show that speed related agile practices are used to a greater extent in comparison to quality practices, and that software startups who adopt the Lean Startup approach do not sacrifice quality for speed more than other startups do.
Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Marco Mondini, Dron Khanna et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡4