Skip to content
Review Open access

Between the hype and harm: does artificial intelligence in health offer solace or further exclusion for marginalised populations in Sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review

Aug 2026 · Global Health Action · Vol 19 · 0 citations · 44 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This scoping review aimed to map and synthesise the existing evidence on the existing evidence on the implications of AI for health equity among marginalised populations in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare systems and has the potential to improve health outcomes. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), however, concerns remain that AI may either reduce or exacerbate existing health inequities depending on how it is developed, governed, and implemented. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesise the existing evidence on the implications of AI for health equity among marginalised populations in Sub-Saharan Africa. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and selected grey literature sources were searched between February and March 2026. Peer-reviewed and grey literature examining AI applications, governance, or implementation in healthcare involving marginalised populations or health systems within SSA were eligible for inclusion. The review followed the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline. Two reviewers independently screened sources of evidence and extracted data using a standardised charting form, and findings were synthesised thematically. Twenty-three sources of evidence met the inclusion criteria. Two dominant narratives emerged. AI may reinforce existing inequities through digital infrastructure gaps, algorithmic bias, under-representation of African datasets, weak governance, and data colonialism. Conversely, AI has the potential to improve health equity by expanding healthcare access, strengthening disease surveillance, supporting health system planning, and improving access to specialised services. Across the literature, AI’s impact consistently depended on equitable infrastructure, inclusive governance, and context-specific implementation. AI has considerable potential to advance health equity in SSA. However, achieving equitable benefits requires investment in digital infrastructure, representative data systems, ethical governance, and inclusive policies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Harms associated with engaging with AI for mental health support: A scoping review protocol

This scoping review aims to systematically map the harms which may arise from engaging with AI for mental health support, as formulated in the academic literature, regulatory frameworks, grey literature, and practitioner guidance, to inform the co-production of a harm taxonomy.

X. Hunt, A. G. Mokaya, Sara Zannone et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Feb 2026

Artificial intelligence for healthcare in Nepal: A scoping review of clinical applications, implementation evidence, and health-system governance

Nepal’s AI-health landscape has progressed from conceptual awareness toward early diagnostic validation and deployment, particularly in imaging-based screening and medical education, yet the current evidence remains insufficient for conclusions about scale-up, safety, equity, cost-effectiveness, or system-wide impact.

Prajjwol Luitel, Nischal Neupane · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Digital Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review of Benefits, Adoption Factors, and Implementation Challenges

Digital health is often presented as a way for African health systems to overcome shortages of facilities, specialists, and dependable supply chains, yet the supporting evidence is scattered across separate literatures. This article reviews published work on digital health services in sub-Saharan Africa, with particula...

M. A. Hadi, Qoonita Dzakiyya Falahuddin · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Can Digital Health Reduce Inequities? A Scoping Review of Implementation Evidence from Low-Resource Settings

Digital health can support equity when it addresses defined access barriers and is affordable, usable, culturally responsive, locally supported, privacy-conscious, and integrated into actionable care pathways.

Anani Griselda Basaldua Galarza, A. Gamarra-Moreno, Wini Ebelin Quispe Bautista et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Human in the loop in AI-enabled clinical decision support: a systematic scoping review and reporting checklist for lifecycle governance.

OBJECTIVE To examine the characteristics, implementation strategies, and reported impacts of Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) processes across the lifecycle of AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), and to propose a reporting checklist for HITL in clinical AI research. INTRODUCTION HITL is a conceptual and tech...

Michael Bakker, Aaron Van Garderen, Tamara L. Paget et al. · 0 citations
#data science Review Open access Dec 2026

Social determinants of health interventions to advance health equity in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Social determinants of health interventions can significantly improve health and reduce inequities in sub-Saharan Africa and the need for increased investment in social determinants approaches to achieve health equity is supported.

O. Sanni, A. E. Sanni · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.