Supply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Abstract
Modern supply chains face abrupt supply disruptions, under which the stable lead time assumption behind conventional inventory control no longer holds. Most replenishment models, including existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) formulations, act as feedback controllers. A disruption is treated as an unobservable event, and correction begins only after deliveries are already delayed. In practice, however, disruptions are often preceded by observable precursor signals. This paper develops a risk sensing DRL framework that incorporates such signals into the state of a proximal policy optimization (PPO) agent, introducing feedforward control into the replenishment decision. The signal quality (detection rate) and the predictive horizon are treated as explicit design parameters. In a two-echelon system with graded disruptions, the risk sensing policy achieves substantial cost savings against both a per-environment calibrated (s, Q) policy and an identically trained reactive DRL policy, even with an imperfect signal. The required horizon is short, as horizons longer than needed bring no further gain. In contrast, the savings depend critically on the signal quality, as a meaningful gain over the calibrated benchmark requires a signal that detects well over half of upcoming disruptions. The advantage is greatest where severe disruptions are infrequent. The learned policy operates a state-dependent reorder point that stays low in calm conditions and rises with the severity and proximity of a predicted threat. A transparent rule driven by the same signal captures about 83% of the gain, indicating that most of the value comes from the information itself rather than from the learning method. These results quantify the value of advance supply information in inventory control and show how it supports the transition from reactive response to proactive mitigation.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.