Skip to content

CrystalMO-TuRBO: Multi-Objective Trust-Region Bayesian Optimization for High-precision Joint Crystal Structure Refinement

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 43 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Crystal structure refinement is a fundamental inverse problem in materials characterization, where structural parameters are optimized to reproduce experimental diffraction data. Conventional approaches, such as least-squares and likelihood-based optimization, rely on local search and often struggle with non-convex, noisy, and highly correlated parameter landscapes, particularly when integrating multiple diffraction modalities. Joint refinement of X-ray and neutron data is especially challenging due to their complementary but competing sensitivities, which are typically combined through scalarized objectives requiring manual weighting and leading to suboptimal solutions. We propose CrystalMO-TuRBO, a multi-objective trust region Bayesian optimization architecture for joint crystal structure refinement. The method models X-ray and neutron discrepancies as separate objectives and transforms the problem into a normalized maximization setting. A two-phase optimization strategy is introduced: Phase 1 performs global exploration using parallel trust-region Bayesian optimization across multiple scalarizations to identify promising regions of the parameter space, while Phase 2 conducts localized refinement within a shrinking region to achieve high-precision solutions. This design explicitly separates global search from fine-grained optimization, addressing the unique accuracy requirements of refinement tasks. We evaluate the proposed method on experimentally collected X-ray and neutron diffraction data from single-crystal Ho2Ti2O7. Results demonstrate improved convergence, robustness, and parameter precision compared to classical refinement methods and Bayesian optimization baselines on refinement of a single-crystal pyrochlore material system.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.