Skip to content

Post-Boundary Bridge: Must Local Attention Go Global Between Global Layers?

Jun 2026 · 0 citations · 47 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Post-Boundary Bridge (PBB), which preserves causal attention within blocks and adds direct connections across their boundaries, shows that targeted boundary exchange can preserve model quality while enabling faster, more memory-efficient local attention between global layers.

Abstract

Hybrid Transformers reduce the cost of long-context modeling by combining local attention with periodic full-attention layers. When global communication is already available, however, the best use of local computation remains unclear. We introduce Post-Boundary Bridge (PBB), which preserves causal attention within blocks and adds direct connections across their boundaries. Rather than extending the range of information relayed through successive local layers, PBB prioritizes within-block modeling and nearby exchange, leaving long-range communication to full-attention layers. Across dense and mixture-of-experts models with 205 million to 2.07 billion stored parameters, PBB hybrids retain near-Full perplexity and competitive performance on standard downstream benchmarks while improving controlled source retrieval. At 205 million parameters, PBB also matches a hybrid using sliding-window attention (SWA) in perplexity and achieves higher source-retrieval accuracy. The same boundary-aligned structure enables Flash-PBB, an exact decoding implementation that updates its key-value cache without relocating retained entries. Compared with Flash-SWA, Flash-PBB delivers 1.82x decode attention-core throughput with half the allocated local key-value cache. These results show that targeted boundary exchange can preserve model quality while enabling faster, more memory-efficient local attention between global layers.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.