The results suggest that both protein-based and mRNA vaccines are well-tolerated and significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Abstract
Background
Real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) and relative VE (rVE) data of protein-based and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections inform policy recommendations and reinforce public confidence. The study aim was to assess the safety and VE of the 2023-2024 protein-based and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (XBB.1.5) in a real-world setting.
Methods
The single-site, pragmatic BEEHIVE clinical trial was conducted among participants aged ≥18 years from the Salt Lake City, Utah, area, who had previously received ≥2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, from November 17, 2023, through September 9, 2024. Randomized participants received a protein-based or mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a double-blind manner. An unblinded, nonrandomized comparator control group that did not receive a study vaccine was also enrolled. The primary aim measured VE between the randomized and comparator groups. The secondary aim was to measure rVE between the 2 vaccine platforms. In the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis, VE and rVE were estimated using a proportional-hazards model for symptomatic infections confirmed by weekly self-administered rapid antigen tests (RATs) over 24 weeks, adjusted for covariates. Reactogenicity and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded.
Results
Randomized cohorts (N = 909; protein-based, n = 452; mRNA, n = 457) were largely well-balanced with some differences in baseline covariates versus the comparator group (n = 279), mostly age-related. The mITT population had 142 RAT-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases with an adjusted VE of 43.6% (95% CI, 18.3-61.0); rVE (protein-based vs mRNA) was -26.7% (90% CI, -78.6% to 10.1%) and did not reach statistical significance. Safety and reactogenicity were comparable to previously reported findings, with no serious study vaccine-related TEAEs, myocarditis/pericarditis, hospitalization, or death.
Conclusions
This is one of the earliest real-world trials evaluating the VE of the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccines (XBB.1.5). These results suggest that both protein-based and mRNA vaccines are well-tolerated and significantly reduce the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
ABSTRACT The objective of this analysis was to assess reactogenicity profile differences between a protein- and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine in participants who had previously received ≥2 doses of an mRNA-based vaccine in a real-world, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. In the BEEHIVE/NCT06065176 trial (Clini...
Sarang K. Yoon, Andrew L. Phillips, Hong-Wei Zhao et al.· Human Vaccines & Immunothera...· 0 citations
The relative efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of monovalent mRNA-1273 (ancestral WA1) versus bivalent mRNA-1273.222 (ancestral plus omicron BA.4/BA.5) boosting have not been studied prospectively where HIV and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence are high. CoVPN 3008 (NCT05168813) was a randomized, double-blinded trial in sev...
S. Dadabhai, Taraz Samandari, Bo Zhang et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
The CV0701 and CV0601 mRNA vaccines elicited robust humoral and cellular immunity with an acceptable safety profile, comparable to a licensed, bivalent mRNA vaccine.
Robynne Wong, A. Kuznetsova, Emna Baba et al.· Human Vaccines & Immunothera...· 0 citations
Reliable evidence on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness during the period of Omicron variant predominance was essential to inform global vaccination strategies. Our living systematic review, commissioned by the World Health Organization (WHO), was established to provide an ongoing synthesis and critical appraisal of compar...
Fatema Kazi, C. Y. Shapland, F. Spiga et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
PICOBOO is a randomised, Bayesian adaptive trial evaluating immunogenicity and reactogenicity of licensed COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompetent individuals aged >12 years. We present reactogenicity data for nine vaccines administered as additional doses within adult strata based on age cohort and primary vacc...
McLeod C, M. Dymock, K. Flanagan et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
It was found that, during a 5-month study period with low incidence, JN.1-vaccination provided limited added protection in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Anne J. Huiberts, D. Eggink, B. de Gier et al.· Vaccine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.