Sep 2026· Journal of Memory and Language· 79 references
Memory Processes and Influences
Abstract
Computational models of memory have achieved considerable success by formalizing how traces are encoded, cued, and retrieved. However, the role that individual linguistic experience plays in shaping representational structure has been relatively understudied. Where the issue has been examined, most models assume that a common population-level semantic space suffices, effectively treating individual variation in language experience as noise rather than signal. We test the theoretical adequacy of this assumption. In a large-scale experiment ( N = 478), participants completed a cued recall task in which identical target words were paired with cues drawn from eight different genre-specific semantic spaces (mystery, fantasy, horror, literary fiction, romance, science fiction, thriller, and non-fiction). Participants reported their reading habits across the eight genres, and personalized semantic representations were constructed by weighting genre-specific corpora proportionally to each participant's reading profile. Two complementary analyses were conducted. In a model-free analysis, cosine similarity computed within each participant's personalized semantic space predicted recall and omission outcomes more reliably than similarity derived from generic semantic spaces. In a computational analysis, substituting personalized representations into the embedded Computational Framework of Memory improved cue–target-level predictions over generic alternatives, accounting for approximately 4 percentage points more explained variance. These findings provide proof of concept that variation in individual linguistic experience shapes semantic structure in ways that are both behaviourally detectable and computationally tractable. More broadly, they suggest that the predictive limits of memory models may reside not only in their retrieval mechanisms but also in the fidelity of the representations they assume.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The findings show that speed related agile practices are used to a greater extent in comparison to quality practices, and that software startups who adopt the Lean Startup approach do not sacrifice quality for speed more than other startups do.
Jevgenija Pantiuchina, Marco Mondini, Dron Khanna et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡4