Skip to content

FairMoE-Health: Fairness-Aware Mixture of Experts for Equitable Multimodal Clinical Prediction.

Sep 2026 · IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · Vol PP · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

The Routing Disparity metric and multi-level debiasing framework introduced here generalize to MoE systems operating on demographically heterogeneous populations, providing both an audit tool and an architectural intervention for a bias mechanism that existing fairness methods leave unaddressed.

Abstract

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models for multi modal clinical prediction route patients to specialized ex pert networks based on input modalities, but we show that this routing mechanism introduces a previously un recognized source of demographic bias: because modality availability (e.g., whether a chest X-ray exists) correlates with race, gender, and insurance status, the gating network learns routing patterns that systematically differ across demographic groups. We propose FairMoE Health, a fairness-aware MoE framework that intervenes at three architectural levels: adversarial debiasing of encoded representations reduces demographic information before it reaches the gating network; adversarial debiasing of gating weights further discourages demographic leakage into routing decisions; and equalized odds regularization provides a prediction-level safety net. We introduce the Routing Disparity (RD) metric to quantify demographic imbalance in expert assignments. On three clinical prediction tasks from MIMIC-IV (mortality, length-of-stay, readmission), FairMoE-Health consistently reduces racial Equalized Odds Difference (EOD) and RD across all three tasks, with only small AUROC decreases. The Routing Disparity metric and multi-level debiasing framework introduced here generalize to MoE systems operating on demographically heterogeneous populations, providing both an audit tool and an architectural intervention for a bias mechanism that existing fairness methods leave unaddressed.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

FairGlucose: A CGM Fairness Benchmark Reveals Subgroup Disparities Hidden in Population-Level Validation

It is established that population-level validation alone is insufficient for equity assessment of digital health AI, motivating subgroup-disaggregated reporting as a default standard, and subgroup-disaggregated reporting as a default standard for personalized configurations.

Junjie Luo, Xuzhe Zhi, Rui Han et al. · 0 citations
Open access

A framework for fair and robust clinical risk prediction through collaborative learning and localized uncertainty quantification

A collaborative learning framework that treats demographic subgroups as clients and aggregates their model parameters using strategies that encode different assumptions about group contribution, and a novel difficulty decomposition framework, derived from the localized conformal classifier's calibration scores, disting...

Mary M. Lucas, Christopher C. Yang · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

MAPPE: Rethinking and Improving Fairness in LLMs for Medicine via Minimax Preference-based Prompt Evolution

This paper introduces universal fairness, a clinically grounded definition that reframes fairness as maximizing subgroup-aware diagnostic performance under attribute-conditioned health disparities, and proposes MAPPE, a training-free minimax prompt optimization framework that theoretically promotes universal fairness.

Jiaming Zhang, Yu-Yuan Li, Xiaohua Feng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization

This work identifies routing-induced bias, a failure mode in which subgroup imbalance drives the gating network to route subgroups onto a few experts, and proposes an end-to-end Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that corrects it and improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

Sunhee Hwang · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Beyond Demographic Balance: Multi-Metric and Intersectional Evaluation of Fairness in MIMIC-IV Mortality Prediction

Fairness conclusions in clinical prediction can depend strongly on both the metrics reported and the demographic resolution at which performance is evaluated. We revisit these evaluation choices for ICU mortality prediction on MIMIC-IV, comparing predictive-utility and subgroup-error metrics across several fairness int...

A. Al Noman, Fahmid Al Rifat, Tahrima Hashem et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantifying the imputation paradox and XAI inconsistency in multi-source diabetes prediction: a 353,680-record leakage-free stacking ensemble with dynamic routing architecture

Diabetes affects 537 million adults globally, a figure projected to reach 783 million by 2045. Despite over 4,200 ML prediction studies, clinical translation remains hindered by an over-reliance on benchmark datasets, unmeasured information costs of multi-source fusion, and untested XAI convergence assumptions. We addr...

M. N. Kishore, C. Navaneethan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.