Skip to content
Book

Artificial Intelligence in Contract Formation

TL;DR

The concept of the “meeting of the algorithms” is introduced as a modern alternative to the conventional “meeting of the minds,” emphasising how AI-driven contracts differ from human-based ones.

Abstract

This book explores how artificial intelligence is reshaping the foundations of contract formation under English contract law. As AI systems take on critical roles in forming agreements, traditional legal principles rooted in human decision-making are being challenged. The book introduces the concept of the “meeting of the algorithms” as a modern alternative to the conventional “meeting of the minds,” emphasising how AI-driven contracts differ from human-based ones. Focusing on algorithmic contracting where both parties operate AI systems—particularly those based on machine learning—the book challenges the adequacy of traditional legal doctrines and terminology. It provides a structured analysis of the legal, conceptual, and doctrinal challenges raised by contracts formed without human intervention at the point of agreement. The book proposes a new legal framework that accommodates algorithmic systems as communication and decision-making tools. It redefines consent, examines the attribution of knowledge and intention, and identifies the legal moment of formation in automated contracting environments. It shows how AI-driven contracting is forcing contract law to evolve without relying on fictional agency constructs or debates around legal personhood. Artificial Intelligence in Contract Formationwill appeal to researchers of contract law, technology law, and private law theory, as well as legal practitioners interested in AI governance and legal innovation. It contributes to ongoing debates on AI and law, and offers a roadmap for integrating algorithmic transactions into the mainstream of contract doctrine.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Command Responsibility Under the Rome Statute: Reassessing Knowledge and Effective Control

This article proposes that the ‘should have known’ standard under Article 28(a) be interpreted to encompass risk awareness of AI system limitations, and that effective control extend to the organisational and technological conditions governing AI deployment.

Md. Sariful Islam · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The contractual vacuum: AI procurement and the erosion of good administration

The integration of artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS) within public administration fundamentally relocates the state’s evidentiary and inferential capacities into proprietary software infrastructures. When public bodies deploy these third-party systems, they introduce an acute systemic risk: a structural “con...

Mohammed Abdulbari · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Liability as a Requirement: Allocating Civil Responsibility for Agentic AI Systems

The proliferation of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems autonomous, goal-directed agents capable of acting with minimal human oversight, has exposed fundamental inadequacies in existing civil liability frameworks. Traditional tort, product liability, and custodian regimes struggle to accommodate systems whose...

Emma Lunardi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Ai Technologies and Contractual Obligations: Challenges in Legal Identification and Risk Sharing

The significance of this research lies in the fast-paced digitalization of the economy and the absence of a legal definition for AI contracts in Russian legislation, leading to risks for those involved in contractual agreements. This research examines the subject of legal considerations surrounding AI in...

M. V. Demchenko, Y. Frolovskaya · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

THE VALIDITY AND LEGAL RECOGNITION OF CONTRACTS MADE BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE UNDER INDONESIAN LAW

In the era of globalization, the digital transformation era, the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has enabled computer systems to perform cognitive functions similar to human capabilities, including analyzing, drafting, and even executing contracts autonomously. This technological shift has profoundly influe...

Nanda Dwi Rizkia Nanda Dwi Rizkia, Siti Mastoah Siti Mastoah, Dzul Jalaali Walikrom Dzul Jalaali Walikrom et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Business Decision-Making: A Framework for Human–AI Collaborative Governance and Strategic Value Creation

A validated, practitioner-usable framework for calibrating the degree of AI autonomy granted to decision workflows against the governance capacity of the organization is contributed, and offers implications for management education, internal audit, and enterprise risk functions responsible for overseeing algorithmic de...

P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.