Sep 2026· AI and Ethics· Vol 6· 0 citations· 77 references
TL;DR
An understanding of AI ethics is proposed that distinguishes between diverse instances of AI ethics and the purposes they serve and can illuminate different ways of doing AI ethics and provide a structured way to assess their value.
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of society has raised pressing ethical concerns, from privacy and fairness to autonomy and safety. In response, the field of AI ethics has grown significantly, with a particular focus on developing guidelines to support the responsible development and use of AI. However, this trend has faced criticism, with concerns about “ethics washing” and skepticism regarding the overall value of AI ethics. In this paper, we argue that such criticisms often rely on an incomplete understanding of AI ethics. To address this, we propose an understanding of AI ethics that distinguishes between diverse instances of AI ethics (viz., research, education, practice, and governance instruments) and the purposes they serve (viz., knowledge, communication, and application). By disentangling these elements, we can illuminate different ways of doing AI ethics and provide a structured way to assess their value. Our arguments highlight that critiques of specific instances and purposes of AI ethics do not justify dismissing AI ethics altogether. We conclude by demonstrating how our proposed distinctions can reconcile existing defenses of AI ethics and guide future discourse, ensuring that the field remains both robust and relevant in addressing the ethical challenges posed by AI.
Governments and international bodies have issued a great many artificial intelligence (AI) ethics guidelines over the past decade, yet evidence that they change how AI is built and deployed remains thin. This paper argues that the implementation gap in AI ethics is not only a shortfall of tools. In caring contexts, it...
In order to live well in an AI-based society, designing technically ethical systems, in the spirit of consequentialism, is not enough; rather, it is essential to cultivate citizens who, as AI users, are endowed with virtues and, first and foremost, the virtue of prudence.
Josep Del-Hierro-Dies, J. Sánchez-Cañizares· Scientia et Fides· 0 citations
The main dimensions of AI models'decision-making in areas of professional practice are conceptualized, emphasizing professional ethics' Hierarchically structured relationship with general ethics, and elaborating on the mechanisms through which they reach an equilibrium in situational contexts that involve conflict.
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies raise enormous questions for society and how we should live. For corporations, AI raises questions about how organizations ought to incorporate principles and other forms of ethical guidance into their work. The movement from theory to practice, or “the operationalization quest...
This paper analyzes five influential documents representing the broad field of AI ethics as a ‘sociotechnical imaginary’: a collectively held, institutionalized, and publicly performed vision of the future and outlines alternative pathways toward historically, geographically, and politically situated forms of ethics.
K. Schiølin· Danish Yearbook of Philosoph...· 0 citations
What ethical values and principles should guide and govern AI entities? This is just one of many AI‐related questions facing the world today. Another question—perhaps even more important—is Can ethical values and principles be instilled into AI entities to guide and govern them? The present essay addresses the question...
T. Bynum· Metaphilosophy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.