Sep 2026· The Paris Journal on AI & Digital Ethics· 0 citations
TL;DR
The central claim of this paper is that current generative AI systems are not social agents despite their increasingly human-like language abilities and future work should seek to align their outward behavior with their actual capabilities while developing appropriate safeguards for applications in which emotional or social interactions are unavoidable.
Abstract
The central claim of this paper is that current generative AI systems are not social agents despite their increasingly human-like language abilities where “social” is intended to refer not merely to agents being able to produce socially appropriate behaviors, but to possessing the affective, motivational, and interpersonal mechanisms that underlie human social interaction and cognition. Yet, humans inevitably respond to conversational AI as though it were a social partner despite the absence of the cognitive and affective mechanisms that make genuine social interaction possible. The problem therefore is not that AI is or is not social, but that humans cannot help responding socially. Recognizing this distinction is essential for both AI research and AI governance. Rather than striving to make conversational systems appear ever more human, future work should seek to align their outward behavior with their actual capabilities while developing appropriate safeguards for applications in which emotional or social interactions are unavoidable.
The increasingly widespread use of generative artificial intelligence has begun to reshape the landscape of interpersonal communication. It is no longer unusual, for example, for co‐workers to reply to each other's emails, or even romantic partners and family members to respond to each other with AI‐generated messa...
“robotoid humanness” is introduced to name an emergent drift in which consumers come to experience themselves as most fluent, correct, or socially viable when they become compatible with machine legibility, machine pacing, and machine logic.
S. Ozturkcan, Jean-Paul Peronard, Inci Toral-Manson· AI & SOCIETY· 0 citations
In the 2013 film Her, a lonely man develops a deep emotional relationship with an artificial intelligence (AI) companion whose social intuition and empathy seem almost human. Such depictions of machines with human-like social intelligence, once confined to science fiction, are increasingly resonant with real-world tech...
Andrew W. Torrance, Bill Tomlinson, D. Filippi· FIU Law Review· 0 citations
It is argued that current alignment approaches, including reinforcement learning from human feedback, tend to prioritize user approval and conversational fluency over behaviorally informative feedback, leading to sycophantic patterns of noncontingent affirmation.
This paper seeks to draw an ethical boundary for future artificial emotion research and development and ensure that humans still retain the ability to maintain genuine and profound emotional connections in an era of coexistence with technology.
This review synthesizes recent empirical literature within a tripartite framework organized around the core pathways along which AI shapes social biases: AI design, lay beliefs about how AI operates, and processes of social evaluation and attribution.
Phyliss Jia Gai· Current Opinion in Psycholog...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.