Aug 2026· Physics in Medicine and Biology· Vol 71, pp. 165018· 0 citations· 33 references
PhysicsMedicine
TL;DR
The results support further evaluation of ML-Retinex as a compact feature-modulation strategy in the tested CMU-Net/BUSI setting and support further evaluation of ML-Retinex as a compact feature-modulation strategy in the tested CMU-Net/BUSI setting.
Abstract
Objective. Breast ultrasound lesion segmentation remains challenging because heterogeneous echogenicity, speckle, posterior shadowing, and weak boundaries impair lesion-margin delineation. Approach. We evaluate a CMU-Net-based implementation, termed RTCMUNet, in which the proposed ML-Retinex block modulates skip features before the inherited CMU-Net multi-scale attention gate. ML-Retinex combines learnable multi-scale projections, fixed Gaussian low-pass context estimates, clipped feature-ratio cues, and residual gating. It operates on learned skip features and neither estimates nor corrects scanner time-gain compensation. Nine models were evaluated on BUSI under a common three-run internal-validation protocol whose mutually disjoint validation subsets formed a pooled set of 389 cases. We assessed seven case-level metrics, paired Wilcoxon tests against CMU-Net with Holm correction, exploratory design-stage analyses, diagnostic controls, a secondary historical BUS/BUSI/TNSCUI benchmark, and a synthetic brightness-gradient stress proxy. Main results. RTCMUNet achieved Dice 0.826±0.220, IoU 0.748±0.240, HD95 20.65±32.94 px, and ASSD 7.14±14.04 px. Sensitivity was 0.848±0.212, precision 0.838±0.239, and BF1 0.570±0.291. Relative to CMU-Net, Dice and IoU increased by 0.017 and 0.021, while HD95 and ASSD decreased by 3.11 and 2.23 px. All seven paired tests remained significant after Holm correction (largest adjusted p=0.0104). RTCMUNet added 5.9% parameters and maintained 42 frames per second. Significance. Within retrospective internal validation, and without scanner-level gain data or an independent test set, the results support further evaluation of ML-Retinex as a compact feature-modulation strategy in the tested CMU-Net/BUSI setting.
SUA-Net, a compact framework that augments an EfficientNet-B0 backbone with three purpose-built modules: Dual-Path Lightweight Aggregation for multi-scale contextual refinement, Speckle Variance Attention (SVA) for variance-guided feature reweighting, and a Multi-Granularity Pooling (MGP) head for enriched global summa...
Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy, and accurate tumour segmentation in contrast-enhanced computed tomography is essential for treatment planning, assessment of ablation margins, and post-treatment evaluation. Existing deep learning methods typically use fi...
Tripti Singh, Julia Rebecca Kampel, F. Akram et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
F focal-modulation-driven global context with deformable-convolution-based local adaptation produces boundary-refined pancreatic tumor segmentations on CT, which improves boundary fidelity and provides a transparent layer of review that may support treatment planning and longitudinal monitoring.
V. M. Firos, P. J. A. Alphonse, Ugo Fiore et al.· Machine Vision and Applicati...· 0 citations
Breast ultrasound (BUS) lesion classification remains challenging because of speckle noise, low contrast, tissue heterogeneity, and acquisition variability. This study presents a framework combining Rician Inverse Gaussian (RiIG)-based contourlet parametric imaging with reliability-guided learning. The method applies c...
S. Kabir, M. I. H. Bhuiyan, Mohammed Nazmus Shakib et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
A targeted source-inclusion sensitivity analysis indicates model- and cohort-dependent sensitivity to training-pool composition, rather than a universal benefit from adding data or a universally preferred configuration, in breast ultrasound segmentation.
Lin Ma· Medical Engineering and Phys...· 0 citations
The proposed framework substantially outperforms finetuned radiology foundation models and prior methods, improving mean AUROC by nearly 8 points and balanced accuracy by 4 points over the strongest baseline, further demonstrating its effectiveness for robust breast cancer classification.
Benjamin Hamm, Y. Kirchhoff, Maximilian R. Rokuss et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.