Skip to content

Accountable yet Anonymous AI Agents - Split-Knowledge Binding in National Agent-Identity Layer in China

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.23207 · 1 citation · 13 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A national system in China that occupies a different and underexplored point in the same design space: an agent is associated with a verified legal principal without that principal being disclosed to any business-layer participant.

Abstract

The emerging infrastructure for AI-agent identity has converged, in industry practice and research proposals alike, on a single resolution of the tension between accountability and privacy: make every agent identifiable. We document a national system in China -- built as national infrastructure and scheduled for public launch in Q3 2026 -- that occupies a different and underexplored point in the same design space: an agent is associated with a verified legal principal without that principal being disclosed to any business-layer participant. Re-identification is possible only to a legal authority acting through due process, by separately compelling two distinct government agencies, neither of which can re-identify alone. We name the mechanism split-knowledge binding and are candid that it is conditional: the separation is structural and procedural, not cryptographic, and a state empowered to compel both agencies can re-identify. The paper makes five contributions: (1) split-knowledge binding, an institutional rather than cryptographic separation for escrowed accountability; (2) the ex-post attribution thesis, the argued claim that only attribution-based accountability carries legal force for AI agent actions with legal consequences; (3) the accountability surface, a design concept identifying which agent actions leave identity-bearing traces; (4) a proportionality framework for identity escrow, a decision structure selecting among three trust architectures; and (5) the reflexive jurisdiction method, an evaluative standard administered to the paper's own deployment. The system is evidence of feasibility at national scale; the framework is the instrument by which any deployment -- including this one -- should be judged.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

It is argued that agent security must be evaluated under an untrusted-model assumption: a correct system is one in which a fully prompt-injected agent still cannot exceed the authority explicitly delegated to it, and an authorization broker is implemented that closes the gap.

Panduranga Sai Varma Dantuluri, Jyotirmoy Sundi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

PRIMUS: Identity, Governance, and Verification for Multi-Agent Federations

PRIMUS, which couples prime-power identity with BLS aggregate signatures (PIAC), derives a safe-kill threshold that reduces false-positive agent termination from 80% to 0.00% under 10% channel noise, gives the closed-form economic boundary where singleton governance outperforms Byzantine quorum, and specifies VRF succe...

Sasank Annapureddy, Anjaneya Prasad Thamatani · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.