Skip to content
Review

Governing AI innovation in local government: how trust and risk perceptions shape public support

Sep 2026 · European Journal of Innovation Management · Vol 29, pp. 659-690 · 0 citations · 66 references

TL;DR

A comparative, local government-centred model of public sector AI innovation is advanced by integrating experiential, cognitive, and perceptual dimensions, and offers novel insights into public support mechanisms for responsible local government AI.

Abstract

This study examines how citizens' experiences with public sector AI shape understanding, trust, and risk perceptions, and how these factors influence public support for responsible AI in local government contexts. Survey data from 1,183 respondents across Australia, Hong Kong, and Saudi Arabia were analysed using structural equation modelling. The framework links experience, perceived understanding, trust, perceived risks and benefits, attitudes toward urban AI and surveillance AI, and the prioritisation of responsible AI principles. Experience with local government AI significantly enhances perceived understanding, which in turn strengthens trust. Trust increases perceived benefits and favourable attitudes toward AI-enabled urban services. However, perceived risks remain a central driver of responsible AI prioritisation. Positive attitudes toward routine urban AI applications are also associated with greater openness to more contested surveillance AI applications. Cross-context differences indicate that these pathways vary according to governance setting, sample composition, and exposure to AI-enabled services. The findings are constrained by cross-sectional, self-reported data and differences in sampling strategies across contexts. Future research should use longitudinal designs and extend the model across additional institutional settings. Responsible implementation requires trust-building, public engagement, and proactive risk governance. Local governments can adopt an experience-first approach by beginning with visible urban AI services that build familiarity and demonstrate public value, while extensions to surveillance or other sensitive applications require stronger safeguards, transparency, and public justification. The findings inform the development of transparent, accountable, and citizen-centred AI governance, supporting socially acceptable and equitable urban innovation. The study advances a comparative, local government-centred model of public sector AI innovation by integrating experiential, cognitive, and perceptual dimensions. It offers novel insights into public support mechanisms for responsible local government AI.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Who benefits from trustworthy AI? Public value and citizen legitimacy in urban generative AI governance

The growing deployment of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in urban governance has intensified global debates on trustworthy AI. However, existing research remains largely technology-centric and offers limited empirical insight into how citizens perceive trustworthy AI and how these perceptions are transl...

N. Alqershi, R. Thurasamy · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Cultural values and AI influencers: how trust and attachment drive decision confidence among consumers in the beauty and fashion market

AI influencers are increasingly used in beauty and fashion marketing, but evidence on what drives consumer trust in emerging markets is limited. In collectivist contexts such as Ghana, cultural values may shape evaluations of AI agents. This study examines how cultural values and AI-driven influencer credibility in...

Ebenezer Arthur Duncan, W. Inkumsah, Rockson Opare-Boateng · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Public servants’ perspectives on AI adoption and AI literacy in Austrian public administration.

This paper examines how stakeholders in the Austrian public administration sector perceive the barriers to, and enabling conditions for, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), and the AI literacy needs that emerge from these perceptions. Using exploratory data from these stakeholders, the study applies a descrip...

Gregor Eibl, Gabriela Viale-Pereira, Valerie Albrecht · 0 citations
#explainable ai Book Open access Sep 2026

Exploring Trust Factors in Designing AI-Supported Performance Appraisal System

The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.

Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Building trust and reducing perceived complexity in AI adoption: effects on decision-making quality in maritime organisations

The results indicate that AI system quality, AI system transparency and AI familiarity significantly enhance AI trust, while AI beliefs have a non-significant effect, and suggest that trust is the main mechanism through which AI-related social and technical factors contribute to improved decision-making outcomes.

Zhaotong Li, Ting-Ong Yan, K. Yuen · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

“Spreading the Good News Where It's Needed Most”: Understanding Pre-Adoption Crowdfunding Engagement Through Information Sharing in Emerging Markets

Purpose Crowdfunding adoption remains uneven in emerging markets characterized by low awareness, high uncertainty, and weak social trust. Prior research has focused on financial participation in mature ecosystems, overlooking how engagement begins in nascent contexts. This study conceptualizes crowdfunding information...

Prince Baah-Peprah, Johari Twaha Abdallah, Jovinary Kajuna · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.