The introduction of peer prediction via leave-one-out cross-validated decision trees as a multi-criteria decision-making ranking paradigm that evaluates excess performance rather than absolute scores is introduced.
Abstract
Multi-criteria decision-making methods conventionally rank alternatives by aggregating normalized criterion values into a composite score, an approach that depends on the normalization scheme, requires externally determined criterion weights, and evaluates performance in absolute terms without accounting for inter-criteria dependencies. This paper proposes machine learning-based Peer-Prediction Trees for multi-criteria decision-making, a novel method that ranks alternatives by their excess performance over data-driven peer expectations. For each criterion, a leave-one-out cross-validated decision tree predicts each alternative’s value from its performance on all other criteria; the residual between observed and predicted values extracts how much the alternative outperforms the empirical trade-off structure constraining its peers. Residuals are standardized, aligned with the preferred criterion direction, and aggregated into an Excess Performance Index using uniqueness-based weights derived endogenously from the cross-validated predictive fit. The method is validated on three real-world datasets: a numeric vehicle selection problem (22 alternatives, five criteria), a fully linguistic financial performance evaluation of Turkish listed firms (32 alternatives, four criteria), and a mixed numeric-linguistic exchange-traded fund selection problem (12 alternatives, nine criteria). The contributions of this work are fourfold: (1) the introduction of peer prediction via leave-one-out cross-validated decision trees as a multi-criteria decision-making ranking paradigm that evaluates excess performance rather than absolute scores; (2) a uniqueness-based criterion weighting scheme embedded into the method, eliminating the need for separate weighting procedures; (3) native handling of numeric, linguistic, and mixed decision matrices within a single unified framework; and (4) empirical validation across three heterogeneous real-world applications demonstrating the method’s versatility and interpretability.
Machine learning forecasting systems in noisy, non-stationary, multi-entity environments are commonly optimized for pointwise predictive accuracy, although many downstream decisions depend on the relative ordering of entities rather than exact numerical forecasts. This creates a potential prediction–ranking–decision mi...
M. Hassanein, Reham Nasser Farag, Samar Turki et al.· Applied Informatics· 0 citations
When numerical predictions and ranked recommendations have task value, selection must expose their trade-offs. We examine selection consequences and incremental uncertainty value in biased matrix factorization. Across 35 configurations and four training-evidence levels on MovieLens 1M, CiaoDVD and Yelp–Tampa, validatio...
Mohamed Elrfaey, T. Gulliver· Computers· 0 citations
Credit-scoring systems must translate predictive risk into calibrated, uncertainty-aware, and governable decisions rather than ranking applicants alone. This study aims to develop and evaluate a governed credit-scoring architecture integrating predictive performance, probability quality, uncertainty, and governance wit...
Nasser Khalili, Alireza Saleh Sedghpour, M. Jahanbakht et al.· Machine Learning and Knowled...· 0 citations
Sarse Relaxed Regularized Regression Rule-Fit is proposed, an intrinsically interpretable algorithm for both classification and regression that produces compact and stable rule sets without sacrificing performance, demonstrating that interpretability and predictive reliability need not be mutually exclusive.
The growing importance of university rankings in higher education requires evaluation methods that are both predictive and interpretable. Traditional ranking approaches are usually based on fixed weighted indicators, while purely data-driven machine learning models often provide limited transparency for institutional d...
N. Smailov, Nursultan Kuldeyev, Akezhan Sabibolda et al.· Informatyka Automatyka Pomia...· 0 citations
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are widely used to address complex decision problems involving multiple alternatives and criteria with different characteristics. However, ranking outcomes may be sensitive to normalization mechanisms, criterion weights, and aggregation processes, particularly when benefit...
A. Kalua, A. Kewo, Susi Hendartie et al.· Journal of Decision Support...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.