GALAXI decouples the identification task into independent one-versus-all binary classifiers that each specialize in recognizing a single phase, which remains robust to common experimental artifacts, including low impurity phase fractions, small crystallite size, peak shifts, sample displacement, and texture.
Abstract
X-ray diffraction (XRD) is the primary tool for identifying crystalline phases following synthesis, but automated phase identification remains challenging, particularly for multiphase samples with overlapping peaks and experimental artifacts. While deep-learning methods have been proposed to improve upon classical search-match algorithms, most formulate phase identification as a single closed-set classification problem, requiring one shared model to discriminate among all candidate phases. Here we introduce GALAXI, which instead decouples the identification task into independent one-versus-all binary classifiers that each specialize in recognizing a single phase. These pre-trained classifiers first narrow the search space to a small set of plausible phases, which are then evaluated through Rietveld refinement to identify the combination of phases that best explains the full diffraction pattern. On a curated set of experimental patterns, GALAXI identifies the correct phases with a micro-F1 score of 0.935, outperforming classical search-match and prior deep-learning models. The method remains robust to common experimental artifacts, including low impurity phase fractions, small crystallite size, peak shifts, sample displacement, and texture, and performs well when applied to time-resolved in-situ XRD data from solid-state reactions. Moreover, because the phase-specific models are independent, GALAXI can expand to large reference libraries without retraining existing models. This modular architecture enables us to train classifiers for 64,594 structures from the Crystallography Open Database and deploy them through a public web interface at https://galaxi-xrd.com.
A multi-decision framework for XRD phase analysis that integrates representation learning, similarity-based retrieval, and explainable decision support within a unified reference database is proposed and supports reliable, analyst-friendly identification of crystal phases and structures in high-throughput and explorato...
Crystal structure determination requires the phases of scattered waves -- yet diffraction measures only their intensities. Direct methods exploit phase invariants but become less reliable as diffraction information diminishes. Learned phase prediction has lowered the resolution barrier, yet remains primarily confined t...
Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) is a high-throughput measurement used to comprehensively acquire diffraction patterns across a region of interest in a specimen. While the measurement is useful for identifying crystallographic microstructures, the data analysis requires significant...
Kai Kamijo, Motoki Shiga, Shusuke Kanomi et al.· npj Computational Materials· 0 citations
Mapping crystalline phases at heterogeneous interfaces is essential for understanding material performance and degradation. However, structural heterogeneity, phase overlap, and local disorder complicate diffraction interpretation, while growing data volumes make manual analysis increasingly impractical. We introduce 4...
Hao-Ran Zhang, Zian Mao, Shu-Fen Chu et al.· 0 citations
This review systematically elaborates how ML models are driving the transformation of XAS data analysis, and provides a comprehensive overview of the key challenges in data‐driven XAS, including the feature engineering of spectra and structures, strategies for solving the “spectra‐to‐structure” Inverse Problem, and Sim...
Melaku Lake Tegegne, Hao-Dong Yao, Li-Yuan Wu et al.· Advanced Intelligent Systems· 0 citations
High-resolution crystal structure determination using X-ray, electron or neutron diffraction is often limited by poor crystallinity, small crystallite size and instrumental factors, which cause significant diffraction peak broadening and a consequent loss of information. This challenge is particularly severe for nanocr...
Fabrizio Mastrolorito, Mauro De Feudis, Fulvio Ciriaco et al.· IUCrJ· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.