Skip to content
Review

Perceived regulatory clarity and the depth of enterprise AI adoption: anticipatory evidence from the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Aug 2026 · AI and Ethics · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A selective-coordination account of regulation is proposed: perceived regulatory clarification can change the depth and composition of adoption without producing broad diffusion, and the central contribution is therefore a selective-coordination account of regulation.

View source

Similar papers

Open access 2026

No borders for compliance: EU AI act obligations for non-EU digital agencies and tech companies

This paper addresses the critical problem of non-EU digital agencies and tech companies that service the EU market but remain largely unaware of or unprepared for their compliance obligations. The enforcement of the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) on August 2, 2026, introduces a comprehensive reg...

Ivana Denčić, S. Stanisavljev · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

EU Influence in Global AI Governance and its Limits

How structural and contextual factors in the field of AI governance affect the likelihood and transformative potential of a Brussels Effect there is investigated, and four reasons to be skeptical of big EU influence are advanced.

Sina Hoch, Daniel K. Mügge · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Determinants and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Sector Governance: A Systematic Review

The TOE-I structure developed here gives policymakers and public sector managers a shared vocabulary for diagnosing where their own agencies stand and where intervention would matter most, and suggests that AI adoption in government is less a technology problem than an organisational and human one.

Muhammad Shafeeq Mohd Sapian, H. Musa, N. Rashid et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Act

This paper proposes MARLA (Map, Assess, Report, Learn, Adapt), a conceptual scaffold organising regulatory learning as a five-stage cycle centred on the implementation of legal requirements into socio-technical practices situated at the Local, National and European levels of the AI Act's governance architecture.

Alessio Buscemi, Tom Deckenbrunnen, Imane Hmiddou et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Striking the balance between innovation and risk: A practical governance framework for AI adoption in financial services

This paper explores how AI can be deployed as a pre-review and triage mechanism — supporting global consistency, scalability, and time-to-market — while preserving human judgment, accountability, and regulatory defensibility.

Johanna Anders · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.