VAmoS Bench, the Voice Agent Simulation Bench, measures complete voice-agent systems end to end in a stateful customer-support task and catches an agent that claims to have changed a card without updating the database as well as one that makes the right database change while disclosing protected information.
Abstract
Production voice agents span cascaded, speech-to-speech, and hybrid architectures. Voice-agent benchmarks typically measure component quality and conversational properties such as word error rate, latency, naturalness, and turn-taking. Fewer measure whether the agent handled a phone call correctly on its own. Contact centers refer to this as ``containment'': the share of phone calls the automated system resolves without handing off to a human. On some phone calls the right outcome is refusal or a redirect. To address this gap, we introduce VAmoS Bench, the Voice Agent Simulation Bench. It measures complete voice-agent systems end to end in a stateful customer-support task. The agent is Riley, a credit-card support representative for a fictional bank who can freeze, cancel, replace, or activate a card. Each of 100 scenarios supplies a simulated caller with a private goal and a seeded PostgreSQL backend. The platform uses each scenario to populate and activate an isolated simulation in which the caller reaches Riley over audio; roughly one-third apply adversarial pressure. The agent can use five tools that execute real SQL against the backend. Each scenario also defines binary assertions. A grader evaluates them against the complete trace of what the caller and agent said and what the agent did, including tool invocations, arguments, and returned rows. This catches an agent that claims to have changed a card without updating the database, as well as one that makes the right database change while disclosing protected information. This first benchmark version focuses on financial services. Its evaluation protocol supports an evolving leaderboard: additional voice agents can be evaluated on the same version, while later versions can expand the tasks and scenarios.
Generally, most voice agents are cascaded systems, i.e., an ASR model transcribes the caller's audio, a language model reads the transcript and decides what to say and which backend tools to call, and a TTS model speaks the reply. Nearly all of the decision making happens in the language model, but existing evaluations...
Pritish Mishra, Ishaan Kumar, Akshat Mandoli et al.· 3 citations
VAmoS Energy, a benchmark that combines challenges in 100 calls about utility billing and payment assistance, is introduced, showing why voice agents need evaluation across the whole call, including what they say, what they change, and how they handle competing speech.
Joshua Meyer, S. Shayegan, Ritiz Tambi et al.· 0 citations
SpeechGym is presented, an audio-native agentic environment in which two omni-modal models converse in native audio, with no external ASR or TTS and no API boundary, over the unmodified tasks, tools and success check of an established text agentic benchmark, so that the interaction modality is the only variable and the...
Large language model (LLM) computer-use agents are typically evaluated with clean written instructions, despite speech being an increasingly popular interface for interacting with such systems. Speech input introduces an additional failure point: transcription errors can alter task-critical entities, constraints, or ta...
T. Chiba, Guang-Zhi Sun, Zhe-Qi Yuan et al.· 0 citations
D DuplexWorld introduces six worlds where voice agents are especially useful: banking, insurance, travel, healthcare and logistics, and Pathfinding, and shows that even the best voice agents leave substantial room for improvement on all 3 axes.
Multiparty Bench is introduced, the first benchmark specifically designed to objectively evaluate conversational speech systems as active participants within multi-party contexts and assesses agent behavior along two primary dimensions: turn-taking awareness and response appropriateness.
Yi-Jen Shih, Shih-Yun-Shan Kuan, Guan-Ting Lin et al.· 2 citations· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.