Skip to content
Review Open access

Machine Learning For Risk-Prioritized Infrastructure Policy Enforcement: Reducing False Positives And Enforcement Overhead In Regulated Cloud Environments

Aug 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · Vol 18, pp. 866-876 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The paper argues that risk prioritisation is the near-term ML contribution to regulated cloud policy enforcement that clears both the SecOps and the auditor bar, provided the system produces reason codes on every ranking and preserves a compliance-defensible decision-audit store.

Abstract

Cloud policy enforcement in regulated environments produces alert volumes that outpace the human capacity to triage them. Policy-as-Code tools (Open Policy Agent, HashiCorp Sentinel, Kyverno), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) platforms, and Kubernetes admission controllers together generate tens of thousands of policy events per day at enterprise scale, and a substantial fraction are false positives, low-severity findings, or issues already accepted as compensating-control exceptions. The operational consequence is alert fatigue: analysts become desensitised to signals, real high-severity events are missed, and mean time to resolution grows even as the underlying detection stack grows. This paper proposes a risk-prioritisation layer that sits between policy engines and the SecOps triage queue. The layer uses machine learning to (i) suppress or downgrade signals that historical dispositions have shown to be benign, (ii) predict which configurations are likely to drift into non-compliance before they do, and (iii) tune policy thresholds and exception rules from analyst feedback. The paper contributes a three-way task taxonomy for ML-augmented policy enforcement, a four-layer reference architecture that binds signal ingestion, feature engineering, ML scoring, and human-in-the-loop review under an immutable audit trail, a model-selection guide that matches data type (audit log, tabular alert, config drift, multi-signal fusion, feedback stream) to recommended technique, and an evaluation framework that reports both model performance (precision, recall, F1, AUC) and operational outcomes (false-positive reduction, alert volume, mean time to review, missed critical alerts). The paper argues that risk prioritisation is the near-term ML contribution to regulated cloud policy enforcement that clears both the SecOps and the auditor bar, provided the system produces reason codes on every ranking and preserves a compliance-defensible decision-audit store.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Demo: tfdrift - A Severity Taxonomy and Risk Classification Framework for Infrastructure Drift Detection

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools like Terraform have become the standard for declarative cloud resource management, yet configuration drift, where deployed infrastructure diverges from its declared state, remains a persistent operational and security challenge. Current detection approaches treat all changes equivalen...

Sudarshan Bhagvanthakur · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Cloud-Native MLOps Framework for Drift Detection, Automated Retraining, and Reliable Real-Time Inference in Predictive AI Systems

Tight architectural integration between telemetry and orchestration removes human-in-the-loop operational overhead and keeps live predictive systems resilient against distribution decay, and demonstrates that tight architectural integration between telemetry and orchestration keeps live predictive systems resilient aga...

Sri Charan Chowdary Konidina · 0 citations
Open access 2026

A Hybrid Rule-Based and Machine-Learning Framework for Detecting Human-Layer Cybersecurity Policy Violations in Simulated High-Assurance Environments

The findings imply that the hybrid model provides a more efficient and balanced way of detecting cybersecurity policies’ violations compared to either rule-based or machine learning models analysed sep- arately.

Lewis Chiholyonga, B. Halubanza · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

SENTRYPdM: A Unified Alarm Governance Architecture for False-Alarm-Resilient Predictive Maintenance

False alarms remain a primary obstacle to the industrial scalability of predictive maintenance (PdM) deployment. While existing research focuses on refining Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction accuracy, relatively little attention has been paid to the systemic governance required to distinguish true degradation from...

Yu-Ming Hsieh, Fan-Tien Cheng, Chieh-Wen Cheng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Adaptive Context-Aware Service Control Policies for Secure Multi-Tenant Cloud Environments

Multi-tenant cloud environments demand adaptive security governance policies that cannot be fixed. Traditional Service Control Policies (SCPs) are usually pre-established, coarse-grained, and isolated from runtime characteristics such as user behavior, workload sensitivity, or region-specific constraints. This discrepa...

Vanakovarayan Srinivasan, Saravanan Subramanian, Priyaradhikadevi Thirugnanasambanthan · 0 citations
#explainable ai Open access Sep 2026

A dynamic explainable AI framework for real-time intrusion detection and automated alert prioritization in security operation centers

The Dynamic Explainable Framework (DEF), which couples a machine-learning detection backbone with inference-time SHAP and LIME explanations and an explanation-aware alert prioritization layer, is proposed and designed and profiled for real-time operation on benchmark traffic traces.

Muhammad Usama Nazir, Mohammed Alsuhaibani, Asri Binngadi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.