Skip to content
Open access

Efficacy and Safety of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Molnupiravir in Non-Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Aug 2026 · Medicina · Vol 62, pp. 1566 · 0 citations · 30 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Both antivirals showed similarly low progression, hospitalization, and mortality rates in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Oral antiviral agents nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) and molnupiravir are recommended for the early treatment of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who are at increased risk of disease progression. Real-world comparative data on these two agents remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NMV/r and molnupiravir in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study with a sample size of 122 initially non-hospitalized adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection treated at the Clinic for Infectious Diseases, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina (UCCV), Novi Sad, Serbia, during 2022. Patients were treated within the first five days of symptom onset with either NMV/r (n = 48) or molnupiravir (n = 74) for five days. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, comorbidities, vaccination status, laboratory parameters at baseline and on day 3, chest radiography findings, hospitalization, and mortality were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: The groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, vaccination status, or vaccine type. Between baseline and day 3, the increase in lymphocyte count (p < 0.001) was significantly greater in the molnupiravir group. Chest radiography showed no significant between-group differences. Overall, 6 patients (4.9%) were hospitalized, with no significant difference between antiviral agents (p = 1.000), and no deaths occurred. Among patient-reported symptoms effects, the incidence of dysgeusia was significantly higher in patients treated with NMV/r (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both antivirals showed similarly low progression, hospitalization, and mortality rates.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Real-world effectiveness of early nirmatrelvir/ritonavir initiation after COVID-19 diagnosis in outpatient setting against severe illness, hospitalization, death, and long COVID in N3C

Evaluated the real-world effectiveness of NMV-R in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, death and long-COVID in a large nationwide cohort of outpatients with COVID-19 and found it overall effective at preventing the risk of severe acute outcomes including hospitalization and death, as well as long COVID.

Steve R Makkar, Kristen Hansen, Arjun S. Yadaw et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Real-world effectiveness and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B: a 48-week retrospective cohort study

Tenofovir amibufenamide treatment achieved effective virological suppression and high rates of ALT normalization by week 48, with renal function and lipid levels remaining stable, in a real-world cohort of CHB individuals.

Jia-Rui Zheng, Yuxuan Song, Bo Feng et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Efficacy and safety of an 8-week bemnifosbuvir and ruzasvir regimen in chronic hepatitis C: Results from a Phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AIMS Bemnifosbuvir and ruzasvir are potent pan-genotypic inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase and NS5A protein, respectively. This single-arm, Phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bemnifosbuvir and ruzasvir in treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV infection of any genot...

A. Jucov, Brian Conway, J. Feld et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir targeting viral persistence in post-COVID-19 condition (long COVID) in the USA (RECOVER-VITAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, more commonly known as long COVID, has emerged as a major health problem. The pathogenesis of long COVID is unknown, but among the leading hypotheses is viral persistence. We aimed to investigate whether the use of the SARS-CoV-2 antiviral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir i...

L. Baden, N. Shah, Sean T. H. Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness and Safety of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) Versus Remdesivir in COVID‐19: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Retrospective Studies

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) and remdesivir are antiviral agents that have been widely used in the management of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). This systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of Paxlov...

A. Akbarzadeh, Masoud Razeghian, Foruzan Hajiabadi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.