Aug 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly discussed through the lenses of safety, capability and employment disruption. This report examines a broader question: how should economies, organisations and institutions adapt if machine intelligence becomes progressively more capable, scalable and economically consequential? It proposes an AI Transition Architecture connecting technological safety with human capability, workforce transition, economic participation, organisational adaptation, social resilience, institutional and legal adaptation, and international coordination. The analysis develops three diagnostic transition gaps—the AI Transition Gap, Governance Capability Gap and Economic Participation Gap—and examines how increasing AI capability may interact with labour markets, productivity, ownership, institutional competence and concentrations of technological, economic and political power. The report develops an integrated set of frameworks including a Six-Dimensional Concentration-Diffusion Model; Capability-Authority-Accountability; competence-floor subsidiarity; a Legislative Control Stack; Human Capability Stack; Automate-Augment-Reserve-Develop; Transition Financing Stack; Universal Economic Participation trigger system; and Human Prosperity Test. The central proposition is that AI should decentralise human capability faster than it centralises institutional power. Rather than treating its principal diagnoses as predetermined conclusions, the report specifies evidence and indicators capable of weakening or falsifying them. It draws on institutional, academic and frontier research current through August 2026 and distinguishes observed evidence from scenarios and normative recommendations. The report concludes that AI safety is essential but insufficient as a complete transition strategy. The wider challenge is architectural: designing institutions, economic mechanisms and capability systems through which increases in machine intelligence can contribute to broadly distributed human capability, agency, opportunity and prosperity while maintaining effective accountability and constraints on concentrated power.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
Objective There is dearth of information on the timeliness of antenatal care (ANC) uptake. This study aimed to determine the timely ANC uptake by a medically trained provider (MTP) as per the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and the country guideline. Methods Cross-sectional survey was done with 2,731 wo...
B. Sarker, Musfikur Rahman, T. Rahman et al.· PLoS ONE· 89 citations· ⚡7
This study investigates how Lean internal startup facilitates software product innovation in large companies and identifies its enablers and inhibitors, and shows the potential of the method-in-action framework to investigate the Lean startup approach in non-startup context.
Henry Edison, Nina M. Smørsgård, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 78 citations· ⚡6