Skip to content
Review Open access

Autodesign? Large Language Model Evaluations for UX Assistants

Aug 2026 · DAT Journal · 0 citations · 5 references

TL;DR

This paper maps key evaluation challenges and proposes three frameworks specific to these tasks and offers design teams a practical roadmap to incorporate continuous, evidence-based testing, promoting greater rigor and accountability in AI-assisted design practice.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are being rapidly integrated into design workflows for Design Systems, UX research, and UX writing, but systematic methods to evaluate their safety and utility are lacking. Based on a scoping review, this paper maps key evaluation challenges and proposes three frameworks specific to these tasks. Each framework connects design activities to measurable success criteria (e.g., ≤ 3% hallucination, < 2s latency) and suggests datasets for reproducible testing. A demonstration with GPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 illustrates how the metrics identify the models' strengths and weaknesses. The guidelines offer design teams a practical roadmap to incorporate continuous, evidence-based testing, promoting greater rigor and accountability in AI-assisted design practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

EduDesignEval: A Structured Evaluation Framework for Educational Program Designer Using Large Language Models

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created unprecedented opportunities for transforming educational program design. However, the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks raises concerns regarding the content quality and pedagogical effectiveness. This study proposes EduDesignEval, a comprehensi...

Ayanbek Serikov, A. Biloshchytskyi, A. Mukhatayev et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Augmenting Physics Instruction and Assessment through Multimodal AI: Insights from Project Ethel

Multimodal large language models are quickly expanding what AI can support in STEM instruction and assessment, but they also undermine answer-focused, unsupervised assessments. We describe Project Ethel, an institutional platform for course-specific, instructor-controlled AI assistance that emphasizes controlled contex...

Gerd Kortemeyer · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Sep 2026

Human versus machine

Although LLM-based benchmark ratings can approximate expert judgments and reduce the need for labor-intensive human triple coding, limitations remain regarding cost, genre- and task specificity, and sensitivity to text presentation and student grade level—factors that constrain immediate classroom use, particularly for...

Afra Sturm, Valentin Unger, Fabian Grünig · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ELBench: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Education-Facing Large Language Models

ELBench is introduced, the first benchmark to evaluate all four requirements (General Capability, Safety and Trustworthiness, Basic Education, and High-Level Cultivation) on the same models under a common protocol, combining curated public sources with newly synthesized safety and cultivation data.

Yi-Lin Jiang, Xiao-Rong Zhu, Fei Tan et al. · 0 citations

Look Before You Prompt, and After: Scaffolding Human-AI Collaboration in Software Tutorial Creation

This work designed a tool called dBlocks with the following features: blocks to scope content, a context manager to edit context, and inline execution to verify code, and shows how human-centered design can guide the development of LLM-integrated tools.

Avinash Bhat, Vy Bui, Jin L. C. Guo · 0 citations
Case report 2026

Tuning LLMs for Text Analysis

This one-day workshop provides hands-on, research-oriented training in fine-tuning large language models for extracting reliable, domain-specific insights from text data, and combines conceptual clarity with guided Jupyter notebooks, teaching participants how to fine-tune open-source models, apply efficient techniques...

Seraphine F. Maerz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.