Skip to content
Review Open access

Perceived Desirable Difficulty in AI Tutoring: Engagement, Retention Confidence, and Continued Use

Aug 2026 · Australian Journal of Artificial Intelligence Review · Vol 2 · 0 citations

TL;DR

It can be understood that difficulty in AI tutoring is not harmful when it is productive, adaptive and psychologically meaningful, rather, manageable challenge can support deeper engagement, stronger motivation, better retention confidence and sustained AI tutoring use.

Abstract

This study examines the role of perceived desirable difficulty in AI tutoring systems and explains how productive learning challenge influences learner engagement, productive struggle orientation, intrinsic motivation, knowledge retention confidence and continued use intention. Although AI tutoring is increasingly used in higher education, much of the existing discussion mainly focuses on usefulness, satisfaction and general acceptance. Due to this reason, less attention has been given to whether students accept AI-supported difficulty as a meaningful learning condition. To address this gap, the study developed a structural model by integrating the Desirable Difficulties Framework, Self-Determination Theory and technology continuance logic. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was applied, and data were collected from 358 university students who had experience using AI tutoring or AI-assisted learning tools. The proposed model was tested through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling using SmartPLS 4. The findings show that perceived desirable difficulty is the main psychological and learning driver in the model. It significantly influenced learner engagement, productive struggle orientation, intrinsic motivation, knowledge retention confidence and continued use intention. The result also shows that intrinsic motivation, learner engagement and productive struggle orientation significantly improved knowledge retention confidence, which later influenced continued use intention. Moreover, perceived AI adaptiveness significantly moderated the relationship between perceived desirable difficulty and continued use intention. From the above findings, it can be understood that difficulty in AI tutoring is not harmful when it is productive, adaptive and psychologically meaningful. Rather, manageable challenge can support deeper engagement, stronger motivation, better retention confidence and sustained AI tutoring use.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Book Open access Aug 2026

Steering AI Tutors Through System Prompts: A Crossover Study on Self-Regulated Learning and Cognitive Engagement Scaffolds in CS1

The results suggest that the pedagogical behavior of AI tutors may not be easily steered through system prompts alone: embedding established SRL and CE frameworks did not produce detectable improvements on any preregistered outcome in a large, ecologically valid deployment.

Maximilian Georg Barth, Sverrir Thorgeirsson, K. Etemadi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Confidence to Commitment: Self-Perceived Competence and the Motivational Pathways to Intellectual Engagement with AI Learning Tools

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming part of how students think, not only what they use. Whether a learner engages with such a tool or delegates to it is a decision about how their own cognitive resources are deployed, which places that decision within the realm of study of human intelligence. Investment acc...

Fahad Alsudairi, A. Asiri, Mohammed Khojah et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Oct 2026

CHEMISTRY STUDENTS’ AWARENESS AND INTENTIONS TO USE AI-DRIVEN TUTORING SYSTEMS FOR LEARNING

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven technologies are increasingly being integrated into chemistry education to facilitate personalised and adaptive learning. This study examined the awareness, intention, and perceived usability of AI-driven tutoring systems among senior secondary school students in Ilorin City. The stu...

Abiola Tawa Ahmed, Hameed Olalekan Bolaji, S. O. Makinde et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Engineering student perceptions of generative AI use in learning trust judgment and information seeking

Generative AI is rapidly reshaping higher education, yet its influence on student learning in engineering remains insufficiently understood. In courses that require conceptual understanding, design reasoning, and problem-solving, AI tools may support learning by providing explanations, solution pathways, and feedback....

Yara Mohammed, Hassan Qandil, Brady D. Lund · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Effect of AI-Powered Tutoring Systems and Student Self-Efficacy on Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills of Students at Kolehiyo ng Pantukan, Philippines

This study explores the influence of AI-powered tutoring systems and self- efficacy on the mathematical problem-solving skills of BSED Mathematics students in Kolehiyo ng Pantukan. Using a quantitative predictive-correlational research design, data were collected from 131 students through validated survey questionnaire...

Michelle Nazareno, Kristine Bea Gonzales, Rhea Marie Aliviado et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

AI Use and Learning Outcomes Among Undergraduate Students: The Mediating Role of Learning Motivation, Locus of Control, and Learning Preferences

Background. The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has created new opportunities for personalized learning, although its contribution to student achievement remains theoretically and empirically contested. Purpose. This study examined the direct and indirect effects of AI use on conceptual...

Achmad Nashrul Waahib, Aminah Aminah, Abdul Sahib et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.