This study highlights key curatorial and audience-acceptance challenges associated with employing AI as a “co-creator” in gallery practice, creating four visitor segments: Traditionalists, Visualists, Skeptics, and AI Enthusiasts.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various fields, including art. Studies comparing human- and AI-generated art primarily examine evaluation, perception, and the ability to identify art created by AI. To the authors’ knowledge, no study was focused on creating visitor segments based on their AI art perception. To answer this gap, this article presents a comprehensive empirical study examining the integration of AI into a contemporary art exhibition and creating visitor segments. The exhibition featured original paintings by Klára Sedlo, displayed alongside their AI-generated visual reproductions, text-based analyses, and audio interpretations. Employing advanced generative models (GPT-4o, GPT-4o mini, DALL-E 3, and TTS-1), we produced multiple iterations for 19 selected artworks. Visitor perceptions were systematically examined using questionnaires and analyzed by statistical methods, including factor and cluster analysis. The findings reveal a wide spectrum of audience responses regarding the aesthetic and conceptual value of AI-generated art, creating four visitor segments: Traditionalists, Visualists, Skeptics, and AI Enthusiasts. This study highlights key curatorial and audience-acceptance challenges associated with employing AI as a “co-creator” in gallery practice.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing the way digital art is created and shared. It provides new opportunities for faster content creation but it also creates concerns about artists careers and creative ownership. This study examined how freelance and professional artists perceive the growing use of Ge...
C. Visco· International Journal of Soc...· 0 citations
By proposing tentative criteria for detecting and assessing epistemic impact in art generally, the paper offers a preliminary framework for evaluating both AI-generated and human-made art in future developments of artistic knowledge production, while also tracing their interactions.
Hedvig Jalhed, Mattias Rylander· Humanities and Social Scienc...· 0 citations
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed visual art, drawing, and painting. Creativity in artistic expression used to be exclusive to humans; however, with advances in AI, it is augmented and, in some cases, performed autonomously by algorithms. This study presents a comprehensive investiga...
M. Alhomaidi· Engineering, Technology &...· 0 citations
Generative AI has influenced almost all fields of the humanities, and so is the case with literature. The role of generative AI in creating formal and straightforward content is well known. However, there is a significant lack of knowledge about its capabilities in serious literary work. The present study seeks to eval...
Saima Usmani, Soaoda Alzahrani· International Journal of Lan...· 0 citations
This article explores how expert practitioners sustain, redefine, and sometimes resist aesthetic standards in an era of algorithmic co-creation of GenAI by identifying how expert practitioners sustain, redefine, and sometimes resist aesthetic standards in an era of algorithmic co-creation.