Sep 2026· Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education· 0 citations· 34 references
TL;DR
Generative struggle is conceptualized as an integrative construct that synthesizes five established cognitive traditions to explain learning under AI-mediated conditions, suggesting that excessive reliance on algorithmic efficiency may erode cognitive engagement by bypassing the generative struggle central to language acquisition.
Abstract
Background: This study develops generative struggle as a pedagogical framework for AI-mediated English language acquisition, addressing the cognitive risks associated with AI-driven task completion and cognitive offloading.
Objective: The study aims to: (1) identify psychological barriers that may influence learners’ engagement with their own cognitive resources during AI-mediated writing tasks, and (2) conceptualise the teacher’s role as an epistemic mentor who promotes generative struggle, divergent thinking, learner agency, and meaningful language development in GenAI-assisted writing environments.
Methods: The study adopts a conceptual and theoretical synthesis approach, integrating perspectives from cognitive psychology, second language acquisition, English language teaching, and educational technology. The inquiry draws on five established traditions: the generation effect, desirable difficulties, writing-to-learn, error-based learning, and cognitive offloading. These perspectives are considered alongside the learner-centred vision of NEP 2020 to examine the relationship between cognitive effort and meaningful language development.
Results: The analysis suggests that excessive reliance on algorithmic efficiency may erode cognitive engagement by bypassing the generative struggle central to language acquisition. The proposed framework therefore prioritises generative struggle and guided self-correction over mere task completion, repositioning the teacher as an epistemic mentor who fosters reflective, metacognitive, and critical engagement beyond the “impressiveness trap.” Rather than rejecting automation, the framework advocates pedagogically mediated AI integration that supports generative learning while limiting cognitive outsourcing. These findings provide a basis for preliminary instructional directions adaptable to learners’ proficiency levels, institutional contexts, and assessment designs.
Conclusion: The paper conceptualizes generative struggle as an integrative construct that synthesizes five established cognitive traditions to explain learning under AI-mediated conditions. The concepts of the AI education loop and the impressiveness trap further illuminate emerging tensions between AI-assisted performance, cognitive engagement, and genuine learning. Together, these concepts provide a conceptual basis for understanding how AI-mediated educational environments can support meaningful learning without displacing the cognitive effort essential to language development.
It is argued that the central educational challenge is not whether GenAI improves single-task language performance, but how learners develop calibrated trust, critical judgment, self-regulated feedback use, and professional agency in human–AI language-learning environments.
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing instruction, yet the mechanisms through which AI integration may improve written English proficiency (WEP) remain theoretically fragmented.
Objective: This systematic review synthesises literature published wit...
K. A. Hassan, Azza Jauhar Ahmad, R. Romly· Revista Cultura Científica· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence is transforming English language teaching by introducing new possibilities for personalised instruction, automated feedback, conversational practice and learner-controlled language development. However, the integration of AI into English language teaching remains uneven, with existing research o...
K. Vijitha, Yogesh Babu Thunga· Journal of Advances in Devel...· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has entered education faster than the theoretical and methodological frameworks used to evaluate it. This critical integrative review asks a more consequential question than whether GenAI ‘works’: under what pedagogical conditions can it augment learning without displacing lea...
A. Haro-Sarango· Multidisciplinary Latin Amer...· 0 citations
A conceptual model is proposed; the AI-Mediated Language Learning Model (AMLL) to map the dynamic relationships among AI tools, teacher agency, student interaction, and language development and is argued that the future of ELT must be neither technophilic nor technophobic, but critically reflexive.
Y. Y. Adam· Australian Journal of Busine...· 0 citations
Qualitative evidence from the Moroccan EFL context reveals that participants generally perceive AI as a complementary pedagogical tool that enhances lesson planning, instructional material development, learner autonomy, creativity, and teaching efficiency rather than replacing teachers.
Jaouhara ELmzandi· International Journal of Lin...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.