This is the first scientific attempt to standardize the pluralizing of nouns, and generally words that identify an object, in Western Armenian, a topic which has been overlooked and has led to diverse and unacceptable practices.
The study tries to clearly differentiate and categorize words according to their structural features: a) monosyllabic words as well as multisyllabic simple words, b) complex words which have a monosyllabic or multisyllabic second constituent. The latter are the basic material of this study.
The author divides the complex words with a multisyllabic second constituent into two groups: 1) multisyllabic second constituents which identify an object, 2) multisyllabic second constituents which have adverbial features. These eventually help us discern whether to use the pluralizing եր or ներ suffix.
The author examines and discusses an extensive list of words which constitute the most often used words in Western Armenian. He expects using these words as templates will enable individuals to orient themselves and pluralize according to the norms.
Still, there is, however, a set of words which lack any norms of pluralization and are practiced according to personal perceptions. So far these have escaped the possibility of following any rules of pluralization. One may optimistically state, however, that time will offer solutions for these.
This paper examines the definition and differentiation of word and word-form in connection with a participle. The author notes that there have been diverse responses but no comprehensive answer has been given to this challenging question. Interestingly, one needs to note that the same is true for general linguistics to...
Աշոտ Մկրեան· Haigazian Armenological Revi...· 0 citations
The study focuses on diverse sorts of lexical borrowings of the Armenian language (particularly Western Armenian) from Turkish.
The author groups these borrowings into two categories: a) word borrowings, and b) grammatic-syntactic borrowings.
Regarding the word borrowings, the author considers several different sorts o...
The suffix –նակ, which goes back to the Classical Armenian (Grabar)
adverbial suffix –անակ /-anak/, has been involved in word-formation processes
since the Middle Armenian period. About two dozen words containing this
formative have been recorded, most of them dialectal in nature. Initially, these
words functioned as a...
Davit Gyurjinyan· Bulletin of Brusov State Uni...· 0 citations
The semantic aspects of the grammatical category of occurrence and the forms of grammatical expression have often undergone changes during the historical development of the Armenian language. That is why they have often become the subject of examination and discussion in Armenian grammars. The question was addressed mo...
The term "Haykabanutyun" often comes across in scientific literature and fiction. The concept of "Haykabanutyun," however, hasn't been defined so far and we cannot explain what did Haykabanutyun/Haykaban specifically mean.
The author tackles this concern in this article, based on diverse dictionaries and other sources....