Skip to content
Review Open access

Clinical Utility of Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing Beyond Multigene Panels in Hereditary Cancer

Sep 2026 · Genes · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 53 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review critically examines the current evidence supporting the clinical utility of germline WES in Hereditary Cancer syndromes, focusing on the clinical scenarios in which WES may provide meaningful additional information beyond multigene panels, its diagnostic yield, limitations, and future perspectives in precision oncology.

Abstract

Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) has emerged as a powerful genomic approach for investigating Hereditary Cancer predisposition through the comprehensive analysis of coding regions across the genome. Although multigene panels currently represent the standard diagnostic approach for Hereditary Cancer assessment, a substantial proportion of high-risk individuals and families remain molecularly unexplained. In this setting, germline WES may serve as a valuable second-tier strategy by identifying pathogenic variants in genes not routinely included in conventional testing panels and by addressing part of the unresolved “missing heritability” observed across Hereditary Cancer syndromes. Increasing evidence supports its application in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch-like syndrome, colorectal polyposis, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer predisposition, where WES has contributed to the identification of additional susceptibility genes and improved molecular characterization. Beyond Hereditary Cancer diagnostics, exome-based approaches have also been explored for tumour profiling, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assessment, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic stratification. However, despite its significant potential, the clinical implementation of WES remains challenging because of the high burden of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), difficulties in variant interpretation, incidental findings, and the need for robust functional validation of candidate genes. This review critically examines the current evidence supporting the clinical utility of germline WES in Hereditary Cancer syndromes, focusing on the clinical scenarios in which WES may provide meaningful additional information beyond multigene panels, its diagnostic yield, limitations, and future perspectives in precision oncology.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Exome-based cancer driver gene comprehensive testing can provide a genetic diagnosis for individuals with triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by aggressive behaviour, high tumor heterogeneity, and an increased likelihood of recurrence and early metastasis. These factors hinder successful treatment. Genetic diagnosis enables personalized clinical recommendations and treatment options. The objective of this...

D. Alzate, A. Y. Sánchez, Yovana Pacheco et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Review on Screen, Shield, Stop: Halting Hereditary Cancer through Genomic Surveillance and Crispr – Cas9

Hereditary cancers account for approximately 5–10% of all cancer cases and arise due to inherited pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes. Advances in genomic medicine have transformed the early identification of individuals at high risk, enabling timely surveillance, preventive interventions, and personaliz...

K. C., Marian Joseph, L. K · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Abstract B036: Systematic Germline and Tumor Genomic Analysis for Gene Discovery in Familial Pancreatic Cancer

A systematic discovery pipeline focused on families with multiple affected individuals, leveraging familial segregation and matched tumor analysis to identify novel hereditary PDAC susceptibility genes, highlighting the complexity of hereditary PDAC and support continued genetic and functional evaluation of the priorit...

Jing-Xiong Xu, Y. Goldberg, Amy Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Interpreting TP53 pathogenic variants in germline testing and cancer genomics: pathogenicity, origin, and clinical actionability.

An origin-aware, three-layer framework comprising variant pathogenicity assessment, origin attribution, and clinical actionability is proposed to support proportionate surveillance, cascade testing, and shared decision-making.

I. Imoto, Nobue Takaiso, A. Yoshimura · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Multi-ancestry sequencing analysis in 293,141 participants identifies predisposition DNA repair genes associated with HCC risk.

Rare variants in MSH6 and BRCA2 are significantly associated with increased HCC risk, revealing a previously unconfirmed role for DNA repair genes in HCC susceptibility across ancestrally diverse populations and may inform genetic risk stratification and surveillance strategies.

A. Garófalo, Perapa Chotiprasidhi, Josephine P. Johnson et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Clinically actionable genetic findings by exome sequencing performed for therapeutic purposes in children with very-high risk cancer included the MAPPYACTS study.

INTRODUCTION Next-generation sequencing performed for therapeutic decision-making in pediatric cancers provides an opportunity to identify germline variants associated with hereditary cancer predisposition and other actionable inherited conditions. METHODS Germline whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed within th...

Tiphaine Adam-de-Beaumais, Yahia Adnani, L. Guerrini-Rousseau et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.