Sep 2026· American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation· 0 citations· 30 references
TL;DR
Intracortical excitability measures may serve as biomarkers for upper-limb recovery, especially during early-phase rehabilitation, supporting the interhemispheric competition hypothesis.
Abstract
This study examines whether clinical assessments and cortical excitability measurements are associated with upper-limb motor recovery in patients with subacute and chronic stroke.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized trial (n=27) with 3 groups: 1 Hz rTMS with fluoxetine, sham rTMS with fluoxetine, and placebo fluoxetine with sham rTMS. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed treatment response using FMA-UE and JTHF scores at 30 and 90 days, evaluating clinical variables and motor cortex excitability as predictors.
At 30 days, FMA-UE improvement was predicted by higher intracortical inhibition in the undamaged hemisphere (
P
=0.03), motor-evoked potentials in the damaged hemisphere (
P
=0.02), more exercise (
P
=0.01), and early rehabilitation (
P
=0.037). JTHF improvement was linked to lower intracortical facilitation (
P
=0.002). At 90 days, less severe stroke (
P
=0.037) and early rehabilitation (
P
=0.007) predicted better outcomes. rTMS was not a key factor.
The presence of motor-evoked potentials in the damaged hemisphere and higher intracortical inhibition in the undamaged hemisphere are linked to motor recovery. Intracortical excitability measures may serve as biomarkers for upper-limb recovery, especially during early-phase rehabilitation, supporting the interhemispheric competition hypothesis.
It is suggested that ccPAS can facilitate recovery by modulating higher-order, distributed brain networks in chronic stroke patients by inducing widespread reorganization of RSNs, enhancing connectivity within and between networks subserving attention, visuospatial processing and sensorimotor integration.
Xiang-Xin Xing, Jia-Jia Wu, Jie Ma et al.· Brain Communications· 0 citations
Stroke causes long-term disability, and rTMS—by modulating cortical excitability and promoting neuroplasticity—may enhance post-stroke motor recovery. To investigate the effect of rTMS on motor outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients admitted within two weeks of onset and to compare high- and low-frequency rTMS...
Amal S. E. Elmotayam, Walid R. Ashour, Rania S. Nageeb et al.· The Egyptian Journal of Neur...· 0 citations
Although MEP shows promise as a biomarker for cognitive impairment assessment, longitudinal validation is needed to confirm its predictive utility, as the excitability of the unaffected motor cortex progressively declines with worsening cognition.
Zhipeng Yan, Hao Luo, Bilian Guo· Annals of Human Biology· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have identified the right cerebellar Crus I (rCrus I) as a promising target for rTMS in improving language rehabilitation. However, it remains unclear whether continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the rCrus I improves language outcomes in patients with subacute post-stroke aphasia (PS...
Xin Wang, Xin-Lei Xu, Dao-Ran Wang et al.· Neurorehabilitation and Neur...· 0 citations
Contralesional LF-rTMS provides a statistically significant but modest improvement in post-stroke upper-limb motor recovery, and exploratory within-trial biomarker-stratified analyses suggested larger effects in participants with preserved CST integrity or positive motor-evoked potential (MEP) status.
M. Yu, Y. Zeng, H. Zhou et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations