Analyzing work patterns of nearly 200,000 software developers at 500 firms suggests benchmarks alone are insufficient for evaluating economic responses to AI progress, as new model capabilities reshape worker tasks and propagate unevenly across firm types.
The ongoing advancement and adoption of artificial intelligence continues to raise concerns about widespread job losses. Over the past three years, our regional business surveys have asked firms about their AI adoption and its effects on their workforces. This year, we found that AI use among regional businesses has co...
Jaison R. Abel, Richard Deitz, Natalia Emanuel et al.· Liberty Street Economics (Fe...· 0 citations
Will artificial intelligence (AI) help poorer countries catch up? This paper argues that the answer depends less on access to AI than on the capacity to use new knowledge productively. We show that countries have narrowed gaps in capital and schooling more readily than gaps in productivity. Technology can diffuse widel...
P. Imam, Jonathan R. W. Temple· IMF Working Papers· 0 citations
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing what employees do, what skills organizations value, and how firms prepare their workforce for technological change. Yet an important issue is receiving much less attention: access to AI reskilling may not be equally distributed. Organizations may invest heavily in em...
Tilottama Ahmed, Farzana Rahman· HHH Research Blog· 0 citations
For the artificial intelligence (AI) economy, we propose a principal worker model where each knowledge worker is both a task architect and an AI agent orchestrator. As task architect, the worker divides each task into subtasks and delegates some to AI agents. As agent orchestrator, the worker optimizes outputs from AI...
Teck-Hua Ho, Catherine Yeung· California Management Review· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.