Significant progress has been achieved in the bioprinting of skin, cartilage, bone, osteochondral tissues, vascularized constructs, and composite craniofacial tissues, but major barriers remain.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an evolving biofabrication approach in regenerative medicine with the potential to overcome many limitations of conventional reconstructive techniques, including donor-site morbidity, limited tissue availability, and suboptimal restoration of form and function. Recent advances in biofabrication have accelerated the development of patient-specific living constructs for reconstructive applications. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the use of 3D bioprinting in reconstructive surgery, emphasizing developments most relevant to plastic surgery. The current literature on bioprinting technologies, bioinks, tissue-specific applications, translational studies, and regulatory considerations was critically reviewed. Significant progress has been achieved in the bioprinting of skin, cartilage, bone, osteochondral tissues, vascularized constructs, and composite craniofacial tissues. Advances in extrusion-, inkjet-, laser-, and stereolithography-based printing, together with increasingly sophisticated natural and synthetic bioinks, have improved construct fidelity, cellular viability, and tissue-specific functionality. In situ bioprinting, patient-specific computer-aided design, and hybrid biomaterial strategies have further expanded the clinical potential of bioprinted tissues. Despite these advances, major barriers remain, including inadequate vascularization of large constructs, limited mechanical maturation of load-bearing tissues, manufacturing standardization, regulatory uncertainty, and the absence of robust long-term clinical outcomes. Three-dimensional bioprinting is enabling increasingly personalized tissue fabrication, although most applications remain preclinical. Clinical translation will require further advances in biomaterials, vascular engineering, manufacturing standardization, and regulatory science.
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing and bioprinting have emerged as transformative technologies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Conventional 3D printing enables the fabrication of complex, customizable scaffolds that mimic the native extracellular matrix (ECM), providing mechanical support esse...
D. Abuarqoub, Mais Emad, A. Abuarqoub et al.· Journal of Functional Biomat...· 0 citations
Additive manufacturing (AM), particularly three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, is advancing as a versatile biofabrication platform capable of spatially organizing cells, biomaterials, and biochemical cues, such as signaling molecules, in a precise manner to recapitulate the complex architecture of native tissues. Curren...
K. Narayanan, Sung-Soo Han· Advances in Colloid and Inte...· 1 citation
Articular cartilage has limited intrinsic repair capacity, and current clinical approaches often fail to restore durable hyaline cartilage. Three-dimensional bioprinting offers spatial control over cells, biomaterials, and bioactive cues, creating opportunities to fabricate patient-specific constructs that recapitulate...
He-Bin Ma, Zhen Yang, Ya-Jing Li et al.· International Journal of Bio...· 0 citations
The current review offers a complete review of the key aspects associated with the development of 3D bioprinting bioinks, including design concepts, classification, properties, and latest trends.
Shruti R. Balkawade, Devika Sajeev, U. Nayak· ACS Omega· 0 citations
Treatment for oral maxillofacial cancer constitutes a highly specialized discipline encompassing tumor diagnosis, therapeutic management as well as the regeneration of oral cavity and related maxillofacial structure. In recent years, rapid advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies have profoundly tran...
Wei-Min Wu, Jing-Fang Yuan, Ran You et al.· International Journal of Bio...· 0 citations
Cranioplasty is a key reconstructive procedure for restoring cranial integrity, protecting intracranial structures, and enhancing neurological, psychological, and aesthetic outcomes after skull defects. At present, the selection of repair material remains clinically challenging, given that no single material comprehens...
Hao-Bo Wang, Tian-Quan Zhao, Shu Zhu et al.· World Neurosurgery· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.