Two flexible transformations for use in the Bayesian score calibration framework are developed, including a polynomial extension and a sequential application of Bayesian score calibration, which can accommodate approximate models with posteriors that have low support for the true parameter values.
Abstract
Modern statistical models are growing increasingly complex in an effort to realistically capture system dynamics. Using standard simulation-based inference, these models may be computationally prohibitive, necessitating the use of model calibration methods. Bayesian score calibration is a computationally efficient framework for model calibration with strong theoretical guarantees. This framework learns an appropriate correction for an approximate model using a small number of simulations from the data-generating process. Currently, only a location-scale transformation has been explored, which may lack the flexibility to correct the complex error introduced by some approximate models. In this paper, we develop two flexible transformations for use in the Bayesian score calibration framework. The first is a polynomial extension, which can appropriately adjust approximate models with location-varying error. The second is a sequential application of Bayesian score calibration, which can accommodate approximate models with posteriors that have low support for the true parameter values. We also discuss an additional diagnostic for use with this framework. We demonstrate the increased flexibility these two approaches provide over Bayesian score calibration in two illustrative simulation studies.
Results show that SME-BETEL credible sets are asymptotically calibrated to the sampling variability of the score matching estimator, yielding valid frequentist coverage under model misspecification and prove a Bernstein-von Mises theorem for the SME-BETEL posterior.
Jiong-Ran Wang, D. Pati, A. Bhattacharya· 0 citations
An integrated dimension reduction and surrogate modeling framework for efficient and robust model calibration based on the Kennedy O'Hagan framework is proposed, with the following key components.
Additive models offer a flexible framework for modeling nonlinear relationships between predictors and a continuous response variable, where nonparametric terms are commonly modeled via penalized splines. However, such models can be sensitive to outliers, leading to potentially unreliable estimation and inferential res...
Francis K. C. Hui, Ding Ding, Shonosuke Sugasawa· Statistics and computing· 0 citations
Bayesian calibration of functional-output computer models typically relies on dimension reduction techniques, such as functional principal component analysis, which assume that differences among simulator realizations arise only from amplitude variation. When simulator output also exhibits phase variation such as shift...
J. Tucker, Gavin Q. Collins, Gabriel Huerta et al.· 0 citations
Bayesian inference provides a unifying formalism for describing the inferences humans and other animals perform about features of the environment that change on fast timescales (moment-by-moment or trial-by-trial), as well as their learning of environmental contingencies and regularities that vary over slower time scal...
T. Kovács, Máté Lengyel· Current Opinion in Neurobiol...· 1 citation
Martingale posteriors and related predictive resampling methods replace the likelihood--prior pair used within Bayesian inference with a predictive model for future observations. These methods are simple to implement and increasingly popular due to their computational efficiency, but little is known about their ability...
Hui Wang, Edwin Fong, David T. Frazier· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.