Aug 2026· ESMO real world data and digital oncology· Vol 13, pp. 100750· 0 citations· 39 references
Medicine
Abstract
Background Defining, measuring, and reporting exposure in real-world data are important for the valid generation and interpretation of real-world evidence (RWE). This is especially challenging for oncology medicines, due to complicated treatment regimens and adjustments in dose and/or schedule. This scoping review aims to assess the reporting of drug exposure definitions for oncology medicines in RWE studies, using colorectal cancer (CRC) as a case study. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase for RWE studies assessing clinical outcomes of cyclically administered oncology medicines in patients with CRC, published in 2023-2024. We extracted publication characteristics, study characteristics, and exposure variables. We calculated a drug exposure reporting score (0-7), composed of active substance, dose, dosing schedule, number of cycles, treatment episode length, and drug exposure start/end. We exploratively compared characteristics of studies with a high and low score. Results Of the 61 included studies, 59% used hospital data, and 36.1% used drug administration data. Most studies (83.6%) reported the start of drug exposure, and 34.4% reported the end of drug exposure. Median drug exposure reporting score was 3.0 (interquartile range 2.0-4.0). Studies with a high score were 4.6 times more often published in an oncology journal and reported use of guidelines for observational studies 1.8 times more often than studies with a low score. Conclusion Definitions of drug exposure are often underreported in RWE studies on oncology medicines. Lack of clarity concerning oncological drug exposure complicates the assessment of the methodological quality and reproducibility and may affect the interpretation of the association between oncology medicines and clinical outcomes.
Background Capecitabine stands as a pivotal chemotherapeutic agent in gastric cancer (GC) management. While its general safety profile has been documented, comparative pharmacovigilance analyses of distinct capecitabine-based treatment regimens among GC patients remain scarce. Methods This study extracted AE reports fr...
Ru-Bao Sang, Min Zhu, J. Mao et al.· Frontiers in Pharmacology· 0 citations
Abstract Introduction Paediatric phase I oncology trials establish safe dosing and provide preliminary efficacy data for investigational anti-cancer agents in children. The aim of the proposed systematic review is to identify the risk and benefit ratio for targeted therapy agents in paediatric Phase I trials in oncolog...
Joanna Ostrowska, K. Strzebonska, M. Waligora· BMJ Open· 0 citations
Abstract Background Patients with prostate cancer (PC) frequently receive multiple medications for comorbidities, increasing the risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Despite guidelines highlighting DDI relevance, data on real-world management are limited. This international survey aimed to characterize current practi...
A. A. Valsecchi, M. Maffezzoli, M. Cursano et al.· The Oncologist· 0 citations
Harmonized, cross-agency guidance on PRO-CTCAE item selection, endpoint definition, analysis, and presentation may help support its consistent and meaningful use in future oncology submissions and regulatory and HTA decision-making.
E. Basch, Matthew Reaney, J. Roydhouse et al.· Journal of the National Canc...· 0 citations
Background Neoadjuvant drug therapy has become an important component of multidisciplinary cancer treatment, but newer targeted, immunotherapy-based, and multi-agent regimens are often associated with higher costs and uncertainty regarding long-term economic value. This systematic review evaluates the economic evidence...
Ying Nie, Xiao-Hui Wang, Sh Kang et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.