Aug 2026· Perspectives of science and education· Vol 81, pp. 57-70· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is essential to study the experiences of students, identify the benefits and risks associated with the use of GenAI tools, as well as the attitudes of all stakeholders in education before redesigning PBL in response to an evolving technological landscape.
Abstract
Introduction. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) opens up new opportunities for learning foreign languages, but
its widespread adoption in academic settings is ahead of scientific understanding of its meaningful use within specific
pedagogical approaches. This gap is particularly evident in project-based learning (PBL) in English Language Teaching
(ELT), where interactions between students and educators using GenAI tools have not been studied enough.
The aim of this research is to analyze students’ and educators’ experiences and attitudes towards the use of GenAI
technologies in PBL in ELT.
Research methods. The study employed creating online surveys for students and educators of English and ranking
analysis of the data to compare and contrast the perceptions of GenAI in PBL. A total of 894 first-year undergraduate
students and 56 educators from the University of Tyumen (the Russian Federation) participated in the study in 2025.
Results. The study reveals a generally positive attitude among the main participants of the educational process regarding
the integration of GenAI into PBL in ELT. More than half of the students (59.6%) and educators (62.9%) agree that the use
of GenAI tools in PBL enhances time efficiency and improves the quality of project products. However, educators’ opinions
contradict real experiences of GenAI use reported by students. Educators tend to overestimate students’ trust in GenAI
outputs, while the majority of students (92.1%) do not fully trust such outputs and prefer to revise them, viewing GenAI
primarily as a tool for generating ideas and improving project outcomes. While 78.3% of educators agree that students
critically process GenAI-generated responses, the remaining 21.7% emphasize students’ complete trust and reliance on
GenAI, which gives rises to concerns regarding potential risks to students’ critical thinking and creativity development.
KEYWORDS
Conclusion. The findings indicate that while GenAI in PBL holds promise for supporting cognitive and linguistic
development of students, its successful integration requires a well-balanced and integrated approach. It is essential
to study the experiences of students, identify the benefits and risks associated with the use of GenAI tools, as well as
attitudes of all stakeholders in education before redesigning PBL in response to an evolving technological landscape.
The rapid development of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly encouraged its integration into higher education. Choices regarding the adoption of AI should consider also the perspectives of students, as primary beneficiaries of academic training. This study reports the findings of a survey based...
V. Zichil, Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu, Cristina Cîrtiță-Buzoianu· Revista Romaneasca pentru Ed...· 0 citations
The results indicate that students already use tools such as ChatGPT in their academic and teaching practices, mainly to plan lessons, design activities, and organize ideas, whereas the main concerns relate to intellectual complacency, standardization of productions, and weakened authorship.
Acesso Livre, Diego Scherer da Silva, Adriana Justin et al.· 0 citations
The findings revealed that undergraduate students had a positive attitude towards the use of Artificial Intelligence in education and a statistically significant difference was found between Arts and Science students with Science students demonstrating a more positive attitude than Arts students.
Abinash Neog· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
The study is expected to provide useful insights into students’ acceptance, attitudes, and experiences regarding AI-based learning applications and highlight the potential role of AI in making higher education more effective, flexible, accessible, and student-centered.
Srividhya Km, Magesh G· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
The study suggests that effective AI integration requires more than technical competence; it demands pedagogical guidance, institutional coordination, and the development of AI literacy among both educators and students.
It is indicated that Generative AI can be a valuable tool for teaching and learning when implemented in a framework of institutional guidance and training and equitable access and the creation of institutional policies on AI, teacher professional development, student support in digital-literacy, and ongoing investment...
W. Shaikh, Firdous Bugti· TAMSAAL· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.