Skip to content
Open access

Analysis of Quality Normative Requirements: Contributions to the Alignment and Standardization of Standards Applied in Health Laboratories

Aug 2026 · BioTech · Vol 15, pp. 69 · 0 citations · 53 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The findings demonstrate that standardizing normative terminology contributes to greater alignment among quality standards, improving their understanding, dissemination, and application in health laboratories while supporting more efficient and reliable quality management practices.

Abstract

The implementation of Quality Management Standards (QMS) in health laboratories is essential to ensuring the traceability, reliability, and reproducibility of results, thus supporting compliance and continuous improvement. This study identifies and compares the requirements adopted in four widely used four standards for health laboratoriesto evaluate their equivalence and contribute to the harmonization of normative terminology. A comparative analysis of the requirements and their applications in health laboratories was conducted. Subsequently, interrelationships and equivalence among the standards were assessed, followed by an evaluation of the terminology used and the grouping of requirements across the four normative documents. The results revealed a substantial overlap among the standards, particularly regarding quality management, risk management, personnel competence, documentation control, and continuous improvement. However, differences in terminology, structure, and scope were identified, which may hinder the uniform interpretation and implementation of quality systems. The harmonization of terms and equivalent requirements could facilitate compliance, integration of management systems, and accreditation processes. The findings demonstrate that standardizing normative terminology contributes to greater alignment among quality standards, improving their understanding, dissemination, and application in health laboratories while supporting more efficient and reliable quality management practices.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Scientific Integrity and Innovation: A Macroprocess Model for Quality Management in Biomedical Laboratories

A macroprocess model is proposed that organizes, operationalizes, and monitors the requirements of the WHO’s Quality Practices in Basic Biomedical Research (QPBR) Manual, adapting it to the practical/operational reality of laboratories.

S. L. C. Fernandez, R. A. de Souza, H. S. da Hora et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Strengthening Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories: Inspection-Ready Implementation of the World Health Organization Good Practices for Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories and Pathways to Prequalification.

Pharmaceutical quality control laboratories are essential to ensuring the safety and quality of medicines. The World Health Organization (WHO) Good Practices for Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories (GPPQCL) provide a framework for establishing reliable and inspection-ready laboratory systems. This review critic...

I. O. Abu Reid · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Filling the gaps in high-priority reference materials for implementing metrological traceability in laboratory medicine

Abstract The global harmonization of measurements in laboratory medicine is facilitated by the development and implementation of reference measurement systems, including suitable certified reference materials (CRMs). There are, however, a relatively small number of CRM producers worldwide. In the context of limited res...

Mauro Panteghini, C. Cobbaert, V. Delatour et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Comparative Study of Calibration and Measurement Resource Management in ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 9001 Systems

This paper presents a systematic comparative analysis of calibration and measurement resource management requirements as defined in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015. Both standards share a commitment to quality and continual improvement, yet they differ substantially in their prescriptive depth regarding technical...

M. G. Aliyev · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Comparative Evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Regulations between USFDA, WHO, and Indian Schedule M Compliance

This study conducted a structured comparative evaluation of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regulations across three influential frameworks: USFDA 21 CFR Parts 210/211, WHO GMP TRS Annexes, and India’s Schedule M. The analysis was designed around critical GMP domains—Quality Management Systems (QMS), documentation a...

A. Ahmed, K. Nagasree, Shiva Srikrishna et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Regulatory Harmonization and Convergence in Global Medicine Quality Assurance: A Review of Frameworks, Pathways, and Implementation Barriers

The globalization of pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and trade has outpaced the capacity of individual national regulatory authorities to independently assure the quality, safety, and efficacy of every medicine reaching their markets. Persistent prevalence of substandard and falsified products, especially...

O. B. Aneke · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.