Skip to content
Open access

Can ChatGPT Guide Effective Thoracic Imaging Based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria?

Sep 2026 · Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi · 0 citations · 12 references

TL;DR

ChatGPT demonstrated substantial and moderate concordance with ACR recommendations for basic thoracic imaging modalities, particularly CXR, NECT and CECT, but showed variable consistency for advanced imaging techniques, suggesting that ChatGPT may have a limited role as a supportive decision-making tool for non-radiologist clinicians.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the concordance between imaging modality recommendations generated by ChatGPT and the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria for thoracic clinical scenarios.Materials and Methods:68 detailed clinical case scenarios representing 16 thoracic diagnostic categories defined in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria were presented to ChatGPT in a simulated clinical decision making format. For each scenario, imaging modalities suggested by ChatGPT were classified as “usually appropriate,” “may be appropriate,” or “usually not appropriate.” Categorical differences were analyzed using the chi-square test. Agreement between ChatGPT and ACR ratings was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient, and the McNemar test was applied to compare appropriate versus inappropriate classifications.Results: ChatGPT most frequently recommended non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography(NECT) (60.29%), chest radiography (CXR) (57.35%), and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) (54.41%). Other modalities, including chest ultrasound(USG), non-contrast-enhanced thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (NEMRI),contrast-enhanced thoracic magnetic resonance imaging(CEMRI), and positron emission tomography (PET), were less frequently recommended. Cohen’s kappa analysis showed substantial agreement for CXR (κ = 0.625), moderate agreement for NECT (κ = 0.460) ,CECT (κ = 0.520) , and fair agreement for the other modalities. McNemar’s test revealed no significant differences between ChatGPT and ACR classifications for any modality except USG . Conclusion: ChatGPT demonstrated substantial and moderate concordance with ACR recommendations for basic thoracic imaging modalities, particularly CXR, NECT and CECT, but showed variable consistency for advanced imaging techniques. These findings suggest that ChatGPT may have a limited role as a supportive decision-making tool for non-radiologist clinicians.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Appropriateness Criteria, Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of ChatGPT Plus (GPT-4o) for the Interpretation of Chest and Extremity Radiographs Against Routine Radiologist Reporting: A Single-Centre, Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study

ChatGPT Plus achieved overall diagnostic accuracy close to routine radiologist reports, with substantial agreement and high specificity but lower sensitivity, particularly in extremity radiographs.

Uzma Khan, Shravani Moholkar, Fatema Kazi et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

ChatGPT-4o as a decision-support tool in a urological tumour board: a prospective evaluation.

Final recommendation concordance did not meet the protocol-defined benchmark, ChatGPT-4o never altered an MTB decision, and clinically relevant errors occurred even among highly concordant outputs, showing that concordance alone does not guarantee safety.

J. De la Torre-Trillo, A. Munuera, M. D. Ureña et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Impact of Clinician-Recorded ACR TI-RADS Features on ChatGPT-5.4-Based Thyroid Nodule Classification.

Clinician-recorded structured ACR TI-RADS features improved ChatGPT-5.4 thyroid nodule classification accuracy when provided alongside ultrasound images, however, the combined strategy did not achieve higher overall accuracy than features-only input.

Zi-Man Chen, Fei Chen, Ying-Li Wang · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

How appropriate are ChatGPT-5’s answers to acne questions?

Online conversational tools have become increasingly common sources of health information, with many patients seeking acne advice through such platforms. Although they may enhance awareness and encourage early consultation, their medical reliability remains uncertain. Because acne is one of the most frequently searched...

Nazlı Caf, Defne Özkoca, Tuğba Kevser Üstünbaş Uzunçakmak et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Assessment of Diagnostic Concordance Among Clinical Examination, ChatGPT-4, Google Lens, and Histopathology in Dermatological Lesions

Introduction: Artificial intelligence-supported systems are increasingly utilized in dermatology as adjunctive diagnostic tools. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT and Google Lens in skin lesions requiring biopsy, comparing the concordance of dermatologists' clinical diagnoses and AI-generate...

Fatma Karataş Albayrak, Melissa Gedik Melissa Gedik, Burak Onur Zerde Burak Onur Zerde et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.