Jul 2026· Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science· Vol 3, pp. 1558-1578· 0 citations· 25 references
TL;DR
A systematic analysis delivers a rigorous foundation and identifies key aspects of self-evolving analytics pipelines that contribute to reliability and accountability in AI-augmented software systems.
Abstract
Reliable and accountable AI-augmented software systems are crucial for their successful deployment and use. For trustworthy operation at runtime, self-evolving analytics pipelines can enhance monitoring, quality control, and governance of AI applications. A systematic analysis delivers a rigorous foundation and identifies key aspects of self-evolving analytics pipelines that contribute to reliability and accountability. The resulting requirements encompass evaluation-oriented properties, techniques for continuous learning of ML pipelines, and mechanisms for runtime monitoring with data monitoring and quality dashboards. This extended version formalises those requirements in sixteen numbered equations covering reliability, availability, three distinct classes of drift, retraining economics, and accountability; specifies four algorithms governing the self-evolution control loop, joint-condition drift alerting, safe canary promotion, and accountability evidence assembly; and grounds the argument in 2023–2025 incident and transparency data.Reliable AI systems must fulfil numerous conditions, yet evidence illustrates that not all aspects are met concurrently. Empirical studies have established evaluation criteria for model quality, though mechanisms for reliable operation during production are less mature. Supply-chain principles indicate that monitoring and analytics become paramount in production. Reliable operation encompasses continual control in streaming environments, online adaptation of AI models to data drift, and external feedback to alert systems.
This thesis first identifies multiple challenges in achieving rapid DevSafeOps in AD development and then proposes several approaches for addressing these challenges across different phases of the DevSafeOps cycle.
The Probabilistic Augmentation and Governance Model (PAGM), a three-tier framework that formally allocates responsibility between AI agents and human testers across autonomous execution, confidence-gated escalation, and human-led verification, provides a governance-ready foundation for organizations seeking to deploy A...
Rejenish Kiran· International journal of com...· 0 citations
AI-assisted development tools enable software engineers to generate implementations at substantially higher speed and volume than in traditional workflows, yet relatively little is known about how existing guardrails evolve in response.
An AI-driven DevSecOps approach focusing on governance with connections between Secure Software Development, Software Provenance, Runtime Observability, AI for analysis, Deterministic Policy Enforcement, and Responsible Human Decision Making is proposed.
Mir Fawad, Mir Jawad Yaqoob, Khawar Muhammad Saad· American Journal of Engineer...· 0 citations
Industrial artificial intelligence depends not only on advanced algorithms, but also on the unseen data pipelines that feed, organize, validate, and sustain them. This chapter examines how data pipelines shape the design, integration, and quality assurance of AI-driven industrial systems. It explores the movement of da...
M. Foley· Research Journal of Maaref U...· 0 citations
A conceptual framework is established outlining the synergy of Generative AI and AIOps for autonomous pipeline operation with key research opportunities highlighted, and the choice of a cloud-native environment further facilitates the use of AIOps.
Danielle Moreau· American International Journ...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.