Sep 2026· Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology· Vol 2026, pp. 257-263· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
The article examines the impact of cognitive biases on investment decision-making. It substantiates the need to analyze them not only as distinct manifestations of behavioral irrationality but also as interconnected mechanisms in financial decision-making. The theoretical framework of the study is based on bounded rationality and prospect theory. Five cognitive biases that significantly affect investment behavior are systematized as follows: loss aversion, overconfidence, confirmation bias, herding behavior, and anchoring. Based on a synthesis of theoretical propositions and empirical findings, a classification of cognitive biases according to their dominant mechanism of influence is proposed. Three groups are distinguished: belief-formation and belief-protection biases, reference-point-dependent biases, and social-inference biases. The cumulative nature of interactions among cognitive biases is substantiated. In particular, a sequential mechanism is identified in which overconfidence contributes to the formation of a persistent investment belief, confirmation bias reinforces it through selective information processing, and loss aversion increases the psychological cost of abandoning the initial decision. The relationship between anchoring and herding behavior is also examined, highlighting the need to distinguish social imitation from synchronized investor responses to common reference points. Differentiated approaches to mitigating the negative effects of cognitive biases are proposed for individual investors, financial advisers, and institutions. The findings demonstrate that corrective measures should target not only individual biases but also the underlying mechanisms and stages through which investment decisions are formed.
Keywords: behavioral finance, investment decision-making, cognitive biases, loss aversion, disposition effect, overconfidence, confirmation bias, herding behavior, anchoring, investment behavior.
This study empirically tests a structural equation model that explains how individual psychological characteristics influence investor decision-making by looking at the effects of psychological biases and risk tolerance on investment decisions. Investment decisions are rarely based solely on financial data, expected re...
D. R. P. R. Murali· Lex Localis-journal of Local...· 0 citations
Conventional economic models consider how individuals choose the alternative that presents the highest expected payoff. While these models are useful for understanding the assumptions behind financial markets, they are limited in explaining the observed financial choices and behaviors of individuals. The choices indivi...
Dilnoza Ruziboeva· Student Journal of Business...· 0 citations
Psychological biases affecting investor behaviour in financial markets have gained traction over the years but little has been published about their interactions when uncertainties arise. This paper proposes a theoretical Behavioral Systems Theory (BST) of investor behaviour as a complex system defined by the cognitive...
Aderemi Aborode· Texila International Journal...· 0 citations
Investment decisions in emerging markets are often made under conditions of incomplete, uncertain, and difficult to verify information. This study explored the relationship between anchoring bias, framing bias, and investment decision-making through risk perception and whether the association between risk perception an...
A. A. Ashraf, Farrukh Naveed, Muhammad Ishfaq· Acta Psychologica· 0 citations
Behavioural finance questions the idea that investment decisions are based purely on rational calculations of risk and return. International research has demonstrated that financial judgement can be affected by cognitive shortcuts, emotional responses and social influences, but these effects are not consistent across d...
N. R, Kannan D. Pillai· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
This study investigates psychological triggers and behavioral biases shaping investment decisions among Nepalese investors. Employing a descriptive cum causal-comparative design, data from 305 respondents were analyzed using ordinary least squares regression to assess the influence of cognitive and behavioral factors o...
Mohan Prasad Sapkota, Saroj Khadka· Journal of Business and Soci...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.