Jul 2026· Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy· pp. 1-24· 0 citations· 42 references
TL;DR
The analysis shows that AI adoption in public administration is primarily driven by organizational and environmental determinants rather than by technical capabilities alone, and proposes a five-level AI maturity model illustrating a cumulative progression from ad hoc experimentation to integrated and accountable AI use.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify the key determinants influencing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in public administration and to organize them into a maturity framework that supports responsible and progressive implementation.
This paper is based on a conceptual and integrative literature review of 32 academic and institutional studies on AI adoption in the public sector. Identified determinants were analyzed using the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework and subsequently structured into a maturity model inspired by the capability maturity model integration.
The analysis shows that AI adoption in public administration is primarily driven by organizational and environmental determinants rather than by technical capabilities alone. Leadership, governance, transparency and ethical oversight emerge as central conditions shaping adoption trajectories. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a five-level AI maturity model illustrating a cumulative progression from ad hoc experimentation to integrated and accountable AI use.
This paper contributes by organizing existing AI adoption determinants into a coherent maturity-based sequence. By combining the TOE framework with a developmental perspective, it provides structured guidance for understanding how public-sector AI capabilities evolve over time.
It is asserted that policymakers and SME managers need to prioritise training, infrastructure and digital readiness to ease the path for AI adoption and the literature affirms that AI adoption increases the marketing performance of SMEs.
Salma El-Gohary, M. B. Ben Mimoun, Hatem El-Gohary· Journal of Cultural Analysis...· 0 citations
A conceptual framework that explains how AI Leadership Readiness contributes to Institutional Performance through the mediating role of Organizational Agility within the UAE public-sector context is proposed.
Noura Hamad Obaid Alshamsi, W. Mahmood· International Journal of Soc...· 0 citations
An extended theoretical framework that integrates AI-specific trustworthiness and organizational digital maturity as contingency mechanisms is proposed and offers actionable directives for policymakers and business managers seeking to accelerate digital maturity.
Nor Fazalina Salleh, N. H. Asnawi, Norfazlina Ghazali et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a technology that can be applied in many areas, with the
potential of revolutionizing the productivity, decision-making and competitiveness of Micro, Small
and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). However, the adoption of AI by MSMEs has been found to be
less than by large enterprises...
Jagruti Patni, Jigar Nagvadia· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
The SLR demonstrates that effective AI and digital platform governance demands a holistic, context-sensitive approach that actively balances efficiency with justice, innovation with accountability, and risk with public value.
This paper aims to develop an integrated framework for governing the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in government administration by linking AI adoption with governance, data privacy, transparency, accountability, workforce readiness, and regulatory controls spanning the system's lifecycle. The paper employs a...
M. Alenezi· Academic Journal of Research...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.