CoRenew is an open-source platform that uses LLM-based agents to simulate negotiations among multiple stakeholders and evaluate the effects of alternative policy combinations, and can be used to assess policies across different institutional and cultural contexts.
Abstract
The difficulty of collective action remains a central challenge in the design of policies for multifamily residential redevelopment. Stakeholders continually adjust their decisions in response to evolving negotiation contexts and the reactions of others, meaning that when a policy intervenes and which stakeholders it targets can substantially reshape collective outcomes. Assessing these adaptive responses ex ante remains difficult because existing simulation models often rely on predefined behavioral rules. Here, we present CoRenew, an open-source platform that uses LLM-based agents to simulate negotiations among multiple stakeholders and evaluate the effects of alternative policy combinations. Integrating open source geographic and demographic data, the platform can generate synthetic residents, simulate negotiation dynamics under alternative policy settings and compares policy performance across competing objectives. It supports both numerical and semantic policy inputs and includes built-in tools for visualization and result export. We validate its behavioral realism against survey responses from 324 residents and a nine-month observed negotiation process from a real redevelopment case. With its modular and adaptable architecture, CoRenew can be used to assess policies across different institutional and cultural contexts.
PAWS provides an auditable substrate for evaluating agent influence, policy-response cascades, and action-outcome alignment in historically grounded financial simulations, and shows that high accuracy can mask failure to detect rare stakeholder actions.
Tiviatis Sim, Hui-Wo-On Jia, Xin-Ming Gao et al.· 0 citations
Credibility is a central topic for agent-based models intended to support policy-making. Simulations must not only represent the target scenarios and their core dynamics but also demonstrate that their assumptions, parameters, and outputs are empirically grounded and sufficiently accurate for their intended use. This p...
Alba Aguilera, Georgina Curto, Nardine Osman et al.· 0 citations
Public policies addressing urgent social and environmental challenges need to explicitly consider the diverse, often conflicting perspectives of the affected stakeholders. Despite computational decision-support approaches increasingly offering recommendations across diverse human value systems, they still tend to deliv...
Arnau Mayoral-Macau, Jia-Qi Lai, Manala Tyobeka et al.· 0 citations
Multi-agent LLM deliberation has been explored as a scalable way to simulate public deliberation. For such simulations to be informative, persona agents should reflect population opinion patterns and interaction should shape their conclusions. We evaluate whether LLM-based deliberation can meet these two conditions usi...
Chaemi Jang, Junsik Min, Jaewoo Choi et al.· 0 citations
Requirements engineering is a sociotechnical process in which stakeholders communicate, negotiate priorities and establish consensus under uncertainty. As AI agents increasingly participate in collaborative workflows, their integration may reshape group dynamics, induce automation bias and weaken human oversight. To ad...
Israel Mateos-Aparicio-Ruiz, P. Montealegre-Macias, Julio Alberto López-Gómez et al.· 2026 IEEE 34th International...· 0 citations
Influence-Aware Policy Optimization (IAPO), which represents each rollout as a typed influence-dependency graph over trainable agent actions, with user and tool observations serving as evidence, is introduced and advances the understanding of credit assignment in multi-turn user interactions.
B. Ren, Yirong Mao, Yi Yang et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.