A Deterministic Procedure-Aware bilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DPAM-RAG) model, which can be highly beneficial in designing religious advisory systems and integrates dataset modeling, procedure-aware chunking, bilingual alignment, and deterministic transformer-based response generation.
Abstract
The advent of large language models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models has greatly enhanced intelligent information systems. This has resulted in the development of context-aware and knowledge-grounded response generation. This has been highly beneficial in the context of religious advisory systems, which require precision, correctness, and knowledge grounding. For Islamic rituals like Hajj and Umrah, the user needs precise and accurate procedures to follow, which must adhere to specific sequences and knowledge grounding. However, the existing models have many limitations in this context, like hallucinations, a lack of procedural knowledge, bilingual inconsistencies, and an inability to incorporate safety constraints. This has made these models unsuitable for contexts in which incorrect responses can have serious implications. Therefore, in this context, this paper proposes a Deterministic Procedure-Aware bilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DPAM-RAG) model, which can be highly beneficial in designing religious advisory systems. The proposed model can be highly beneficial in designing religious advisory systems. The proposed model integrates dataset modeling, procedure-aware chunking, bilingual alignment, and deterministic transformer-based response generation. Additionally, a confidence-based refusal strategy has been proposed to avoid the generation of responses that can be considered incorrect or out of context. The proposed model has been tested through an extensive experimental setup, which includes multiple transformer models like GPT, LLaMA-2, Mistral, MPT, and BLOOMZ. The experimental results have shown promising outcomes, which can be considered highly beneficial in designing trustworthy AI models.
It is concluded that RAG should be viewed as a grounding and evidence-access mechanism rather than a guarantee of hallucination-free generation, and applications of RAG are outlined.
Shyalaja L. N., Shantinath Patil, P. R. et al.· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
The review finds that RAG can improve knowledge accuracy and timeliness by grounding responses in retrieved evidence and allowing knowledge resources to be updated independently of the base model.
Fluency and reliability are not the same property, and large language models have far more of the first than the second. A model's factual content is fixed at the point training concludes; its errors are distributed through billions of parameters rather than isolated in any inspectable location; and no signal in its ou...
Balakrishna Sreeram· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The results show that the RAG architecture provides a scalable alternative for creating precise, contextually grounded conversational agents, thereby mitigating some of the main drawbacks of LLMs.
Rabia Shabbir, K. Talpur, Shakeel Ahmad· ICCK Transactions on Machine...· 0 citations
Hallucinations in knowledge-intensive tasks are frequent in Large Language Models (LLM). This is alleviated by Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and multi-agent systems, which include external knowledge and tools. Nevertheless, the consistency of retrieved evidence and the tracing of the pipeline in multifaceted int...
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is commonly evaluated by whether the final answer is correct. That test is insufficient: an answer can match its reference while the context that produced it contains a direct contradiction, leaving the contested evidence invisible to answer-only review and retrieval relevance score...
Ramon Gonzalez, A. Díaz· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.