A hardware-grounded architectural co-design together with a comprehensive resource-estimation protocol for surface-code-based modular processors establishes a viable route to distributed fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computation that scales without prohibitive resource growth or heavy orchestration burden.
Abstract
Scaling fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computers will likely require distributed architectures built from multiple manufacturable quantum processing units. A central question is whether noisy and slow inter-chip operations impose substantial spacetime overhead or orchestration burdens compared with monolithic architectures. To answer this question, we present a hardware-grounded architectural co-design together with a comprehensive resource-estimation protocol for surface-code-based modular processors. The design confines inter-chip latency and noise to module boundaries, preventing slow, noisy links from inducing prohibitive spacetime overhead or becoming a global orchestration bottleneck. The resource-estimation protocol integrates hardware constraints and circuit-level error-correction performance into utility-scale algorithmic cost estimates, enabling a controlled assessment of different architectures. Using RSA-2048 factorization as a demanding benchmark, we estimate resources under experimentally anchored parameters and realistic superconducting hardware constraints. Compared with a large, ideal monolithic baseline, the resulting distributed architecture requires only modest additional resource overhead in both qubit count and execution time. More importantly, the overhead is nearly scale-invariant across a broad module-capacity window, decoupling chip size from global performance. This decoupling turns module capacity from a finely tuned architectural parameter into a flexible engineering degree of freedom, allowing chip sizes to be set by manufacturability and control-packaging constraints rather than architectural fine-tuning. These results establish a viable route to distributed fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computation that scales without prohibitive resource growth or heavy orchestration burden.
This work synthesizes efficient circuits for an important primitive in distributed fault tolerance: distributed stabilizer measurements, and considers in particular the surface code and the color code, both as distributed memories and in the case of lattice surgery across separate modules.
Moritz Schmidt, Martin Moureau, Benjamin Rodatz et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
This work establishes fundamental limits on the resources required for quantum fault tolerance, and gives a positive-rate CSS code construction that attains the memory bound, and identifies sufficient conditions under which the same scaling extends from quantum memory to fault-tolerant circuit implementations.
Kishor Bharti, Tobias Haug, Andrew Tanggara· 1 citation
The first experimental demonstration of distributed quantum error detection and correction is reported, providing an experimental foundation for quantum error correction (QEC) across modular quantum architectures.
E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, T. Araki et al.· 2 citations
This work identifies a class of cyclic stabilizer codes realizable through global iSWAP and single-qubit gates, yielding QEC thresholds nearly seven orders of magnitude larger than previous estimates for globally-controlled arrays.
Trapped-ion quantum computers are a leading candidate for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing, but conventional Quantum Charge-Coupled Device (QCCD) architectures face severe wiring and power constraints as systems scale. The recently proposed WISE promise orders-of-magnitude reductions in wiring complexity but f...
Scott Jones, Songqinghao Yang, Prakash Murali· 0 citations
This survey presents a full-stack view of compiler design for QEC-protected quantum computation, and identifies open challenges in cross-layer optimization, qLDPC compilation, compiler-decoder co-design, runtime adaptivity, and the development of integrated and benchmarkable FTQC compilation stacks.
Cheng-Hong Zhu, Jia-Han Chen, Ke-Ming He et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.