2026· Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics· pp. 36979-36999· 0 citations· 28 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work proposes B-APO (Bias-Targeted Adversarial Preference Optimization), which casts debiasing as a bias-targeted min-max game: it generates hard negatives by applying small adversarial perturbations in the latent space to maximally induce language-vision-prior reliance, and then performs preference alignment to enlarge the margin between clean and adversarial responses.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often suffer from modality bias, where the model disproportionately relies on one modality while neglecting critical information from others. Existing debiasing methods via modality masking create biased responses by completely removing an entire modality, forming an extreme and static training environment. However, real-world multimodal bias often emerges under subtle perturbations (e.g., mild occlusion, noisy instructions), where both modalities are present but the model is tempted to rely on spurious shortcuts. We propose B-APO (Bias-Targeted Adversarial Preference Optimization), which casts debiasing as a bias-targeted min-max game: we generate hard negatives by applying small adversarial perturbations in the latent space to maximally induce language-vision-prior reliance, and then perform preference alignment to enlarge the margin between clean and adversarial responses. This encourages the model to anchor on true cross-modal evidence even under the most adversarial conditions. Extensive experiments on bias and hallu-cination benchmarks demonstrate that B-APO achieves superior debiasing performance while maintaining general capabilities.
Trained on large corpora of image-text pairs, vision-language models (VLMs) have proven broadly useful across many applications. However, they can still make errors that humans rarely do, particularly when exposed to adversarial inputs crafted to mislead them. Traditional approaches to uncovering such vulnerabilities typically optimize a single input, such as a text prompt, to induce incorrect predictions while remaining plausible to human readers. These methods tend to identify only one or a few high-impact adversarial examples, offering a narrow view of model weaknesses. In contrast, we argue that a Quality-Diversity (QD) perspective is more informative. Rather than searching for a single best attack, QD explicitly aims to generate many high-quality adversarial prompts spanning diverse behaviors and characteristics. This allows us not only to diagnose model weaknesses, but also to characterize which prompts are robust and which are especially fragile. Our experiments show that CVT-MAP-Elites, a QD method integrated into our pipeline, discovers a richer and more diverse set of meaningful adversarial samples than quality-only optimization. Consequently, our approach achieves broader search-space coverage and provides deeper insight into VLM failure modes on text-to-image retrieval tasks in both general and medical domains.
Thai Huy Nguyen, Khoa Tran, Quan Minh Phan et al.· Annual Conference on Genetic...· 0 citations
The proposed Recursive Self-Correction approach raises model performance from a Political Neutrality Likert scale baseline of 2.14 to 4.56, averaged across all models, demonstrating effective inference-time mitigation of political bias in LLM-generated summaries.
Tejaswi V. Panchagnula, Bruce Coburn, Bryce J. Dietrich et al.· 0 citations
Language bias in Visual Question Answering (VQA) arises when models exploit spurious statistical correlations between question templates and answers, particularly in out-of-distribution scenarios, thereby neglecting essential visual cues and compromising genuine multimodal reasoning. Despite numerous efforts to enhance the robustness of VQA models, a principled understanding of how such bias originates and influences model behavior remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we address this gap through a comprehensive empirical and theoretical analysis, revealing that modality-specific gradient imbalances, which originate from the inherent heterogeneity of multimodal data, lead to skewed feature fusion and biased classifier weights. To alleviate these issues, we propose a novel Multi-Margin Collaborative Debiasing (MMCD) framework 2 , which adaptively integrates frequency-aware, confidence-aware, and difficulty-aware angular margins with a dynamic, difficulty-aware contrastive learning mechanism to reshape decision boundaries under biased training conditions. Extensive experiments across multiple challenging VQA benchmarks confirm the consistent superiority of our proposed MMCD over state-of-the-art baselines in combating language bias.
Huanjia Zhu, Shuyuan Zheng, Yishu Liu et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 2 citations
While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), represented by LLaVA and GPT-4V, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, their visual inputs remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, posing significant security risks. Existing defense methods predominantly target single-task scenarios (e.g., zero-shot classification) and consequently lack generalizability across various multimodal tasks. To address this limitation, we propose a dual adversarial fine-tuning framework that jointly optimizes visual and semantic supervision signals from two modalities, enhancing model robustness while generalizing across multiple downstream tasks. The proposed framework comprises two core components, i.e., $\textbf{Visual}$ supervision branch and $\textbf{Semantic}$ supervision branch. The former branch leverages features from clean images, extracted via a frozen original vision encoder, to guide adversarial robustness while the latter incorporates caption-image alignment as a contextual signal to preserve semantic coherence under attack. Moreover, our method achieves cross-task robustness by simply replacing the CLIP vision encoder in the original model, with no need of separate task-specific retraining or architecture modifications.Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in adversarial robustness evaluation across zero-shot classification, image captioning, and visual question answering (VQA) tasks.
Sibo Wang, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan et al.· 0 citations
Adversarial training under long tailed distributions suffers from a dual imbalance: the class imbalance skews the training objective toward head classes, and the adversarial inner maximization may further amplify this bias. Existing methods mitigate this issue by correcting class priors or adapting class wise robust supervision, yet they treat each class in isolation and fail to identify which boundaries drive long tailed collapse. We propose a Confusion Geometry Rebalancing method (CGRm) for long tail adversarial training, a plug in framework that leverages directed robust errors as training signals. CGRm leverages periodic robust evaluations to derive source class loss weights, class wise robust coefficients, and a directed confusion geometry graph. The method then couples feedback weighted robust optimization with graph guided margin correction, thereby boosting the robustness of vulnerable classes and sharpening the critical boundaries that drive long tailed performance degradation. Experiments on long tailed benchmarks show that CGRm achieves consistent robust performance gains over existing methods, with ablations validating the contribution of each component. We provide the code in the supplement.
Mengnan Zhao, Geyong Min, Lihe Zhang et al.· 0 citations