C COVER changes the output object: a post-hoc, model-agnostic wrapper that turns any grounder, a trained localizer or a black-box video--language model, into one that emits a temporal region containing the true moment with probability at least $1-\alpha$, by calibrating the quantile of a temporal nonconformity score on held-out labels and widening the base prediction by that amount.
Abstract
Event boundaries in continuous video are ambiguous: re-annotate the same query-video pair and independent annotators mark moments that overlap by less than half on a large fraction of samples. The ground truth for video temporal grounding is therefore a distribution over intervals, yet every grounder returns a single interval with no statement of reliability, so at deployment a wrong interval is indistinguishable from a right one. COVER changes the output object: a post-hoc, model-agnostic wrapper that turns any grounder, a trained localizer or a black-box video--language model, into one that emits a temporal region containing the true moment with probability at least $1-\alpha$, by calibrating the quantile of a temporal nonconformity score on held-out labels and widening the base prediction by that amount. The guarantee is finite-sample and distribution-free under exchangeability, and requires neither retraining nor white-box access. We give two score families, a two-sided boundary-widening score for grounders that emit an interval and a super-level-set score for grounders that emit a relevance signal, and develop theory specific to grounding that bounds how large the certified region becomes, when coverage survives conditioning on event length, and how it degrades when moments from one video break exchangeability. Across three benchmarks and five grounders, realized coverage tracks the target, and calibration exposes what point metrics hide.
Video multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can describe what happens in a video, but rarely identify when the supporting evidence occurs. We study generalist video temporal grounding, in which one model predicts a variable-cardinality set of evidence intervals across video lengths, domains, query forms, and viewpoints. Existing training strategies are misaligned with this set-valued task: long-video labels often rely on brittle one-pass annotation, while reinforcement-learning rewards either fail to distinguish non-overlapping predictions or require fragile segment matching. TimeLens2 treats temporal evidence as an interval set throughout supervision and optimization. TimeLens2-93K constructs reliable multi-span supervision through caption-derived proposals, independent localization, cross-agent consensus, semantic verification, and boundary refinement. Our temporal Wasserstein reward computes exact one-dimensional \(W_1\) between uniform distributions over merged interval supports, providing dense, matching-free feedback under unequal cardinalities and equivalent fragmentation; temporal IoU complements it with precise-overlap feedback. Across seven benchmarks, TimeLens2-2B outperforms all size-matched baselines on every benchmark, while the 4B and 8B variants achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing open-source models with up to 397B parameters. The 2B, 4B, and 8B variants improve over their Qwen3-VL backbones by 14.2, 13.0, and 18.1 mIoU points, respectively.
Yuhan Zhu, Changlian Ma, Xiangyun Zeng et al.· 2 citations
Video temporal grounding (VTG) aims to localize the continuous video interval described by a natural-language query. However, current VLM-based methods typically produce this interval indirectly through two endpoint outputs, represented either as discrete timestamp tokens or continuous boundary coordinates. These formulations differ in how endpoints are encoded, but not in what is predicted: the event interval remains a derived object, while interval validity, duration, and interval-level similarity are handled only implicitly. We propose TimePLE, which reformulates VTG from endpoint prediction to interval-native grounding by predicting a single joint distribution over valid temporal intervals. TimePLE maps each interval to a point in a canonical position-duration square, where every support point corresponds to a valid span and neighboring points represent geometrically similar intervals. Given a video and query, the VLM generates a single latent<|TIMESPAN|>token whose hidden state is decoded into a joint interval distribution, refined through duration-aware coordinate correction, and converted into continuous boundaries. The same interval representation is used to encode input temporal anchors, aligning video-side temporal evidence with output-side span prediction. To reliably align the latent span representation with complete event intervals, we curate 90K-scale grounded samples and human-verify 3K-scale benchmark annotations. Experiments across four VTG benchmarks show that TimePLE consistently outperforms endpoint prediction baselines, achieving an average mIoU of 58.9, with clear gains on short-duration and medium-duration events.
Yuhui Zeng, Xinyu Mao, Xiaokun Liu et al.· 0 citations
Multimodal large language models can emit localized predictions, bounding boxes for objects and temporal windows for video and audio events, but they hallucinate these regions prolifically. The model's own token log-probabilities are nearly uninformative: they conflate grounding quality with input ambiguity, and coordinate tokens become near-deterministic once the model commits. We propose Multi-Token Localized Attention (MTLA): a training-free, post-hoc score that measures how strongly a prediction's tokens attend to the region they claim. Prior attention-based detectors, which sum attention over the entire input modality and read a single response token, are weaker special cases; we show that summing only within the claimed region and aggregating across all prediction tokens recovers a stronger grounding signal. The same recipe applies almost trivially to other modalities and tasks: object detection in images and temporal localization in video and audio. Across multiple MLLM families and three modalities, MTLA improves hallucination AUROC by +7 to +38 over the best prior training-free baseline. Used as a confidence score for re-ranking, it nearly doubles the zero-shot COCO detection AP of an open-source 8B generalist (from 20.4 to 37.0), narrowing the gap to supervised detectors without any task-specific training.
Daniel Shalam, Emanuel Ben Baruch, Avi Ben Cohen et al.· 0 citations
Audio-visual event perception (AVEP) determines which events occur in a video, when they occur, and whether they are audible, visible, or both. Training-free methods query new event vocabularies by matching frozen audio and visual features with text-encoded event names. However, related labels share evidence. An incorrect label can then score at least as high as a correct one. We call this a false co-activation (FCA). No scalar cutoff can reject the incorrect label while keeping every correct one. Class-specific thresholds may prevent that label from becoming a final prediction, but the FCA remains in the underlying score vector. We introduce SCoPE, a training-free framework in which all queried labels compete for shared evidence and each modality guides event selection in the other. We derive an exact condition for when this competition removes an FCA in a two-label fit. With identical frozen CLIP+CLAP backbones on LLP, SCoPE improves Type@seg by 7.45 points and Event@seg by 5.04 points compared with the reported AV$^2$A values. The same fixed configuration transfers unchanged to OV-AVEBench and VGGSound-AVEL100k.
J. Jeong, Junho Yoon, Hyunju Kim et al.· 0 citations
Video temporal grounding (VTG) refers to the task of identifying the time interval in a video that corresponds to a given natural-language query. A common zero-shot strategy asks a large vision-language model (VLM) to generate the start and end timestamps directly, so the result depends heavily on the design and training of the model, and grounding accuracy differs widely from one VLM to another. We therefore propose REcognition-based Zero-shot Extraction (REZE), a simple training-free method that splits the video into short clips, asks the model for a clip-level confidence score for the query, and uses a deterministic algorithm to convert the resulting score curve into the output required by the task. Because temporal aggregation is performed outside the model, REZE adapts to different task outputs, from single- and multi-interval moment retrieval to highlight detection. On QVHighlights, REZE improves the best reported training-free moment-retrieval mAP from 38.23 to 40.32, while on highlight detection it reaches 44.18 mAP and 73.41 HIT@1, establishing a new state of the art among training-free methods. Its HIT@1 also outperforms all fully supervised SoTAs on the QVHighlights test split. We evaluate REZE on seven backbones from three model families. On Charades-STA and QVHighlights, it outperforms direct timestamp generation in every available comparison. We further observe that with REZE an earlier-generation model can approach the native performance of a newer model in its family.
Boyang Albert Li, Chenhui Gou, Jianfei Cai· 0 citations
A long-video answer is evidence-supported only when the frames decoded from the video cover every event the answer depends on. Existing evaluations score final-answer correctness or predicted evidence intervals, but the frames a method decodes before answering are rarely audited, so correct answers can still rest on incomplete observation. We introduce VES-Bench, a 600-question benchmark of Temporal Ordering and Event Counting items over 348 public long videos. Each item carries a jointly necessary set of evidence intervals, letting us audit at three strictness levels whether a method's decoded frames cover every one of them. We also propose TRACE, a training-free agent that grounds answers in raw visual clips, builds an evidence bundle round by round, and stops only when the answer stabilises as the bundle grows and a final pass over the same clips returns the same answer. Under a same-backbone audit, TRACE answers 50.7% of questions correctly with at least two decoded frames inside every evidence interval, at 98.7 frames per question: over 10 points above uniform decoding at 128 frames (40.2%), and within 2.6 points of uniform decoding at 256 frames at 0.39x its frame cost, while reaching the highest answer accuracy in the audit (63.5%). TRACE also stays competitive on Video-MME (86.1), LVBench (75.6), and LongVideoBench (75.1).
Peng Liu, Junbo Niu, Xiaoyan Hu et al.· 0 citations