Sep 2026· Proceeding of International Conference on Digital, Social, and Science· 0 citations· 20 references
TL;DR
This study contributes the first comprehensive human-centered AI governance framework specifically tailored to the Southeast Asian context, providing actionable guidance for policymakers navigating complex tradeoffs between technological advancement, human rights protection, and equitable development.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence across Southeast Asia's digital economy has created an urgent policy tension between fostering innovation, safeguarding human rights, and ensuring inclusive prosperity, yet existing governance frameworks remain fragmented and insufficiently attentive to the region's diverse socio-political realities. Drawing on a systematic interdisciplinary review spanning computer science, law, ethics, and social sciences, combined with policy analysis of ASEAN's AI governance instruments including the ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics (2024) and the ASEAN Responsible AI Roadmap (2025-2030), this study develops a multi-stakeholder human-centered governance framework through comparative analysis of AI policy approaches across Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The analysis reveals three governance deficits: fragmented institutional coordination, predominance of non-binding guidelines lacking enforcement, and inadequate participation of civil society and underrepresented communities. In response, the proposed framework operationalizes four interconnected pillars rights-based regulation mandating AI impact assessments, structured multi-stakeholder engagement, strategic localization of global best practices, and sustained capacity building demonstrating that responsible AI governance serves not as a brake on progress but as a strategic enabler of sustainable development and shared prosperity. This study contributes the first comprehensive human-centered AI governance framework specifically tailored to the Southeast Asian context, providing actionable guidance for policymakers navigating complex tradeoffs between technological advancement, human rights protection, and equitable development.
The SLR demonstrates that effective AI and digital platform governance demands a holistic, context-sensitive approach that actively balances efficiency with justice, innovation with accountability, and risk with public value.
The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.
Emre İmamoğlu· Journal of Perspectives in M...· 0 citations
The EMF demonstrates that an AI mirror as reported by Vallor can function as a developmental instrument: relationally grounded engagement oriented toward resonance, rather than replacement, can deepen discernment and strengthen sovereign decision-making rather than producing moral deskilling.
Arulnageswaran Aruleswaran, Thaatchaayini Kananatu· AI and Ethics· 1 citation
This study examines the gaps that still exist between technology adoption, the responsible use of AI, and information system governance, particularly in the use of Generative AI. To address these issues, this study proposes a multi-layered Human Oversight Architecture grounded in the Human-Centered AI (HCAI) approach....
Zahra Salsabilla, S. Sasmoko, Davy Ronald Hermanus· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
The study develops a Leo XIV-informed, normatively grounded hybrid model of AI governance that extends beyond the exercise of agency over technology to fostering a more just and inclusive social order in which technology enables human flourishing.
S. Fel, Marta Choroszewicz, Jarosław Kozak· AI and Ethics· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.