Skip to content
Review Open access

Cataloging Epitope Data: A glimpse into the manual curation efforts of the IEDB team in 2026 2309343

Jul 2026 · Journal of Immunology · Vol 215 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The data input process is detailed with a focus on the manual curation efforts of the expert curation team, including the recent addition of CAR-T cell epitopes, updates to non-peptidic curation, and new quality-control processes for cell lines.

Abstract

The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (IEDB, iedb.org) and its sibling resource, the Cancer Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (CEDAR, cedar.iedb.org), are platforms created and maintained for the benefit of the scientific community, allowing open access to organized epitope data that is then utilized to power the associated epitope prediction tools. The foundation of the curation process is in staying current with published research literature, our primary source of epitope data, and in structuring the data according to associated data ontologies. The process for inputting data includes identification, categorization, curation, peer review, and systemic quality control and validation steps. The curation process results in databases that reflect the epitope literature in the areas of infectious disease, autoimmunity, allergy, transplantation, and cancer. Here, we detail the data input process with a focus on the manual curation efforts of the expert curation team, including the recent addition of CAR-T cell epitopes, updates to non-peptidic curation, and new quality-control processes for cell lines. These improvements help ensure end-users are getting the greatest benefit possible from the IEDB and CEDAR. NIH/NIAID (75N93019C00001), and NIH/NCI (U24CA248138) Technological Innovations in Immunology (TECH)

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

The “2DE-Pattern” Database for Inventory of Proteoform Profiles: 2026 Upgrade and Update on Outcomes

Background: Modern proteomics faces a critical bottleneck: the vast discrepancy between the number of genes in the human genome and the exponentially greater variety of functional proteoforms that actually drive biological processes. Methods: Our paper addresses the urgent need for high-resolution systematic mapping of...

Stanislav Naryzhny, Nikolay V. Klopov, N. Ronzhina et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Engaging the scientific community in high-quality biocuration: a report on the International Society for Biocuration workshop,'Maximizing community curation for the benefit of all'

Biological knowledgebases traditionally rely on expert, professional curation of the research literature to maintain up-to-date collections of data organized in machine-readable form. However, despite the increasing amount of curatable biomedical knowledge, support for knowledgebases is declining, leaving these resourc...

Daniela Raciti, S. Coort, Christian A. Grove et al. · 0 citations
May 2026

MaRDMO: FAIR Documentation of In Silico Research

MaRDMO is a plugin for the Research Data Management Organiser (RDMO) that enables the structured, FAIR‐compliant documentation, and discovery of mathematical research data. By embedding mathematics‐specific questionnaires into a widely used data management plan (DMP) tool, MaRDMO lowers the technical barrier to contr...

M. Reidelbach, Marcus Weber · 1 citation
Open access Oct 2026

KRAKEN: A provenance-tracked knowledge graph for multiomic and wellness research

KRAKEN (Knowledge Research & Analysis Kit for Evidence Networks) addresses this gap by integrating existing graphs with specialized sources such as RefMet, LIPID MAPS, NIH Common Data Elements, Polygenic Score Catalog, and derived wellness measures including biological age and biological BMI.

Amy K. Glen, D. Witherington, Trent Leslie et al. · 0 citations

Ground-truth Construction and Evaluation of LLM Contribution to Life Sciences Tool Annotation

This work compares the respective capabilities of domain experts and of an Large Language Model (LLM) agent to generate useful domain-specific annotations for classifying, indexing, and searching scientific resources, and shows the complementarity between domain experts and LLMs.

Ulysse Le Clanche, Melvin Selim Atay, Elise Bannier et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Omics data discovery agents: Agent-supported retrieval, reanalysis, and synthesis of published omics data

The biomedical literature contains a vast collection of omics studies, yet most published data remain functionally inaccessible for computational reuse. When raw data are deposited in public repositories, essential information for reproducing reported results is dispersed across main text, supplementary files, and code...

Alexandre Hutton, Jesse G. Meyer · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.