Skip to content
Conference

Agentic Validation of AI System Requirements: A Hybrid Architecture for Regulatory Compliance

Aug 2026 · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference · pp. 571-575 · 0 citations · 28 references

Abstract

AI systems face growing demands driven by both technical complexity and the legal obligations introduced by the EU AI Act. Requirements Engineering (RE) currently lacks systematic tooling to validate project-level quality requirements against these legal obligations in a traceable, auditable, and scalable manner. This paper presents my PhD research, which investigates how automated tooling can support continuous validation of quality requirements against regulatory obligations in AI projects, using the EU AI Act as primary application domain. I describe the research vision, report key findings from a first empirical study that grounds the problem in practice, and introduce CARES (Compliance-Aware Requirements Engineering System), a hybrid architecture that integrates rule-based checks, LLM-based semantic reasoning, and structured human escalation to validate quality requirements using a novel 4CT quality schema. Further, I outline a four-phase evaluation roadmap and discuss contributions to the RE and AI communities.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Oct 2026

When Safety Claims Fail Silently: A Modelling Approach to AI Assurance

Problem. The rapid deployment of large language models (LLMs) into safety-critical roles, including mental health support, education, and professional guidance, has created a gap between the safety claims AI developers publish and the behaviors their systems exhibit in practice. Current documentation practices, primari...

Kalvin Thuan-phong Khuu · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Software Engineering Meets the EU AI Act: Artifacts, Patterns, and Future Directions

As AI systems become increasingly integrated into consumer, enterprise, and public-sector software, ensuring compliance with emerging AI regulations has become an important challenge. Under the 2026 Digital Omnibus, the EU AI Act’s high-risk obligations are being phased in through 2027–2028. So far, compliance has been...

Sridhar Chimalakonda, Upendra Karimi · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Sep 2026

SPEC-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT FOR ENTERPRISE AGENTIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR RELIABLE AI-GENERATED SOFTWARE

The Specification Governance and Validation Framework is proposed, a design-science artifact that treats structured specifications as an external control plane for agentic software engineering and provides a reproducible governance model and a basis for future empirical validation of specification-driven enterprise AI...

S. Suryawanshi · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Autonomous Quality Assurance of Enterprise Platforms and Products Using Agentic AI

The growing adoption of Agentic AI and Large Language Model (LLM)-driven systems in enterprise platforms has introduced new challenges for quality assurance. Traditional testing approaches, which depend on deterministic outputs and exact validations, are often insufficient for systems whose behavior is probabilistic, c...

Nathan Marconi, KiranKumar Chandaka, Kirti Mohanty et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Book Open access Oct 2026

End-to-End Regulatory Compliance Evolution Pipeline: From Legal Requirements to Developer Tests

This vision paper presents a workflow that operationalizes constantly evolving regulatory requirements into automated developer-focused tests and orchestration of requirements elicitation, regulatory interpretation, traceability, test generation, and developer feedback into a continuous compliance workflow.

C. Brandt, S. Abualhaija · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Dependable AI-Assisted Engineering: A Formal Framework for AI Participation and Assurance in Safety-Critical Workflows

Generative AI can produce engineering artefacts, but generation alone does not determine whether or how those artefacts should enter safety-critical workflows. This paper develops a formal framework for assigning AI participation and assurance at the level of individual workflow units. Each unit has a participation and...

Pu-Xue Tan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.