HamQASBench is introduced, a structure-aware benchmark comprising eleven molecular Hamiltonians of up to fourteen qubits, selected using Hamiltonian and target-state properties and supplied with exact references, that combines energy accuracy and success rates with reference-relative circuit cost, local entropy profiles for non-degenerate targets, and state identification within degenerate ground subspaces.
Abstract
Quantum architecture search for molecular ground-state estimation is commonly evaluated through energy accuracy, which does not describe circuit cost or the physical properties of the prepared state. We introduce HamQASBench, a structure-aware benchmark comprising eleven molecular Hamiltonians of up to fourteen qubits, selected using Hamiltonian and target-state properties and supplied with exact references. Its evaluation protocol combines energy accuracy and success rates with reference-relative circuit cost, local entropy profiles for non-degenerate targets, and state identification within degenerate ground subspaces. Experiments with five methods spanning four search paradigms reveal differences hidden by energy-only comparisons. On a near-product instance under the shallow search budget, the best outputs of all five methods reach chemical accuracy while using between two and sixty-two gates. Equal-energy outputs on a degenerate instance occupy distinct spin components. Local entropy profiles distinguish inaccurate outputs and show that entangling-gate counts need not reflect realized entanglement. Across the molecular instance ladder, product-state outputs can meet or miss chemical accuracy, motivating interpretation of success alongside target-state properties. These results support retaining energy as the task-success criterion while using circuit-cost and state diagnostics for more informative comparisons. The benchmark instances, references, evaluation implementation, and per-run data are released for reuse.
An open dataset and accompanying code are presented for preparing Dicke states using a collision-based quantum protocol and the accompanying code reproduces the processed data and validation checks, providing a reusable benchmark for studying the trade-off between state-preparation fidelity, circuit cost, and hardware...
Duc-Kha Vu, M. Nguyen, Ş. Özdemir et al.· 0 citations
Compact ground-state preparation circuits are essential for early fault-tolerant quantum chemistry. We introduce Variational Imaginary-time Majorana Evolution (VIME), a classical pre-training algorithm that extends operator-projected variational quantum imaginary-time evolution (OVQITE) to molecular electronic structur...
F. Santona, Manuel G. Algaba, Aeishah Ameera Anuar et al.· 0 citations
This work employs QESEM---a characterization-based, unbiased quasi-probabilistic mitigation method---on IBM's Aachen quantum processor to compute the ground-state potential energy surface (PES) of the symmetrically-stretched water molecule, demonstrating that the characterization-based, unbiased error mitigation provid...
Renato Olarte Hernandez, Emanuele Rossi, S. Coriani et al.· 0 citations
FlowMeas is introduced, which uses a generative flow network to directly sample finite ensembles of shallow Clifford measurement circuits subject to a prescribed shot budget and hardware constraints, and establishes generative learning as a flexible and unified framework for quantum measurement design under practical r...
Jun Dai, O. Nahman-Lévesque, Guillaume Rabusseau et al.· 0 citations
Quantum algorithms are usually optimized for gate count or circuit depth. We find on Quantinuum System Model H2 quantum computer that for a tight-binding chain ground state preparation, there is a system size $N$ beyond which the adiabatic evolution reaches significantly lower energies than the Fermionic Fourier Transf...
This work shows that SQD performance can be strongly influenced by uncontrolled growth of the classical diagonalization subspace, and establishes measurement-basis engineering as a promising route to improving quantum sampling methods for electronic structure.
Connor van Rossum, J. Cohn, Sally Shrapnel et al.· 3 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.