End-to-end fairness optimization (E2EFO) is introduced as a unifying framework that integrates fairness across the prediction-to-decision pipeline and fair decision-focused learning (FDFL), a training paradigm that jointly accounts for prediction accuracy, prediction fairness, and decision regret.
Abstract
Many real-world systems rely on predictive models to inform decisions, and fairness concerns arise in both the prediction and decision stages. We introduce end-to-end fairness optimization (E2EFO) as a unifying framework that integrates fairness across the prediction-to-decision pipeline. We focus on resource allocation with group-based fairness: the prediction task estimates allocation impacts while limiting accuracy disparity across groups, and the decision task distributes those impacts equitably by optimizing a group-based alpha-fairness measure. Within this framework, we propose fair decision-focused learning (FDFL), a training paradigm that jointly accounts for prediction accuracy, prediction fairness, and decision regret -- the loss in decision fairness due to imperfect predictions. FDFL trains the predictor by gradient descent, combining the objective gradients through multi-task learning techniques. The core computational challenge is the decision Jacobian with respect to the predictor parameters: we derive exact closed-form formulas for a tractable class of fair allocation and apply a differentiable optimization layer in the general case. We further establish a finite-sample generalization bound for the scalarized FDFL objective. Numerical experiments on a healthcare-based single resource allocation and a synthetic multiple resource allocation illustrate the value of jointly accounting for prediction fairness and decision fairness in prediction-informed decision-making.
Fairness-aware machine learning depends crucially on the fairness criterion chosen, and it is well understood that these criteria are often in conflict with each other. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by exploring how competing fairness criteria may in some cases interact in helpful ways. We investi...
Munshi Mahbubur Rahman, Shi-Mei Pan, J. Foulds· Proceedings of the 2026 Inte...· 0 citations
This study addresses the critical efficiency-equity trade-off in multi-channel digital trade ecosystems by proposing a fairness-aware meta-learning decision optimization framework for real-time risk offloading under demand shocks. Grounded in the Soft Actor-Critic architecture with composite fairness metrics (Jain inde...
The quadratic cost is introduced into the maximum expert consensus model (MECM) and the fairness utility level constraint is added to ensure that the model outcomes satisfy predefined equity criteria, reflect fairness-sensitive behavior among individuals, and better align with real-world decision-making contexts.
Machine‐learning models can provide accurate predictions in insurance pricing, but can also increase disparities between protected groups. Existing fairness‐aware pricing approaches typically target one fairness notion at a time, making it difficult to compare trade‐offs between predictive accuracy, group fairness, i...
T. Boonen, Xin-Yue Fan, Zi-Xiao Quan· Journal of Risk and Insuranc...· 0 citations
This work proposes a multi-objective reinforcement learning framework that models the evolution of fairness as a dynamic trade-off between material payoff maximization and fairness-driven moral behavior, regulated by a fairness pressure coefficient.
Jing-Yi Zhang, Xin Ou, Guo-Zhong Zheng et al.· 0 citations
We consider fair resource allocation in sequential decision-making environments modeled as major-minor weakly coupled Markov decision processes (M2WCMDP). In this framework, resource constraints couple the action spaces of a major sub-Markov decision process (sub-MDP) and a population of minor sub-MDPs that would other...
Xiao-Hu Tu, Y. Adulyasak, Erick Delage· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.