This work introduces FlowSGS, a flow-based posterior sampling method using Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) to decompose the posterior into a likelihood step and a prior step and provides a form for the prior step that uses SI's reverse-time SDE, and shows connections to previous PnP methods.
Abstract
Flow matching has emerged as the state-of-the-art generative model and has been used for plug-and-play (PnP) priors to solve inverse problems in computational imaging. However, existing flow-based inverse solvers assume linear forward models and/or make simplifying approximations in posterior sampling. To circumvent these problems, we introduce FlowSGS, a flow-based posterior sampling method using Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) to decompose the posterior into a likelihood step and a prior step. Specifically, we sample from the likelihood step using Langevin dynamics and leverage the Stochastic Interpolants (SI) framework to integrate a pretrained flow model into the prior step. We provide a form for the prior step that uses SI's reverse-time SDE, and show connections to previous PnP methods. Moreover, with the aid of the flow prior's straight probability paths and a novel timestep correction technique for the reverse-time SDE, FlowSGS requires fewer network evaluations in its prior step than plug-and-play diffusion samplers. Our experiments show state-of-the-art performance on a range of inverse problems. For the first time, we provide an experiment on a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval) for flow-based inverse solvers.
Flow matching methods for imaging inverse problems typically incorporate measurements through network conditioning or guidance during sampling. Neither approach explicitly applies the forward operator within the learned conditional velocity field. We develop a principled measurement-conditional velocity parameterizatio...
Shirin Shoushtari, Edward P. Chandler, Xiao Shi et al.· 0 citations
Diffusion models are now widely used in Bayesian inverse problems in imaging as priors, where latent diffusion models are often used for larger scale problems to keep the computational complexity and model-size manageable. Unfortunately, the auto-encoder based compression results in loss of spatial detail. In addition,...
Diffusion and flow-matching models can produce high-quality posterior samples for inverse problems, but typically require tens to thousands of network evaluations per draw. MeanFlow enables one-step generation, yet applying it to inverse problems leaves no intermediate steps at which to enforce measurement consistency....
Shirin Shoushtari, Edward P. Chandler, Xiao Shi et al.· 0 citations
Experimental results across several CT inverse problem settings show that Flow Matching-based approaches consistently outperform diffusion-based methods in terms of PSNR, SSIM, and perceptual quality, while requiring fewer sampling steps.
This work defines an explicit surrogate posterior path and derives the Posterior-Dynamics Implicit--Explicit sampler (PD-IMEX), a stable method using one score evaluation per diffusion scale and an implicit data-consistency update, and derives continuous posterior dynamics.
Zhaoqiang Liu, T. Pang, Ruibing Wang et al.· 0 citations
Abstract.
Flow matching-based generative models have been integrated into the plug-and-play image restoration framework, and the resulting plug-and-play flow matching (PnP-Flow) model has achieved some remarkable empirical success for image restoration. However, the theoretical understanding of PnP-Flow lags its empir...
Fan Jia, Yu-Hao Huang, Shih-Hsin Wang et al.· SIAM Journal of Imaging Scie...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.