Skip to content
Open access

Comparative analysis of AI enhancements to rules-based clinical triage chatbot: Convergent mixed-methods study

Jul 2026 · Health Informatics Journal · Vol 32 · 0 citations · 35 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is shown that safe clinical deployment of LLM-based chatbots requires governance addressing accuracy, interpretability, and masking of poorer performance by conversational fluency, and the divergence between user preference and measured accuracy underscores that safe clinical deployment of LLM-based chatbots requires governance addressing accuracy, interpretability, and masking of poorer performance by conversational fluency.

Abstract

Background Chatbots are increasingly used in healthcare for symptom checking and care navigation. However, concerns about accuracy limit large language model (LLM) use in clinical settings. Objective This convergent mixed-methods study evaluated three enhancements to an existing rules-based triage chatbot. The purpose is to inform the development of tools improving patient access and system navigation. Methods Three artificial intelligence tools (Dialogflow, ChatGPT, and Gemini) were integrated into a rules-based workflow from December 21st 2024 to July 7th 2025. Thirteen testers completed 156 vignette-based interactions and 52 Likert-scale evaluations from July 17th 2025 to August 5th 2025. Quantitative outcomes included accuracy, conversational turns, time to completion, and tester ratings. Qualitative feedback was thematically analyzed. Results The rules-based chatbot was most accurate (71.8%, 95% CI 56.2–83.5%), outperforming Dialogflow (30.8%, p = 0.002) and Gemini (41.0%, p = 0.031). Dialogflow, ChatGPT, and Gemini were statistically indistinguishable. Qualitative analysis revealed user preference for ChatGPT and Gemini despite equal or worse performance than the rules-based chatbot. Conclusion Rules-based triage remained most reliable, and the divergence between user preference and measured accuracy underscores that safe clinical deployment of LLM-based chatbots requires governance addressing accuracy, interpretability, and masking of poorer performance by conversational fluency.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Quality and Readability of Four AI Chatbots Answering Search-Derived Patient Questions About Primary Aldosteronism: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

Highlights What are the main findings? Instrument-based information-quality scores differed among the tested chatbot configurations, but these differences do not establish greater factual accuracy, guideline concordance, or clinical superiority; the full-set DISCERN comparison was limited because most questions were no...

Jian-Yu Chen, Zai-Han Zhao, Shang-Yu Han et al. · 0 citations
#large language models Open access Oct 2026

Development and Nationwide Multicentre Evaluation of Guideline-Grounded Large Language Model Chatbots to Support Patient Self-Management and Education in Rheumatology

Patients with rheumatic diseases have persistent information needs that are not fully addressed in routine care. We developed and evaluated guideline-grounded, large language model (LLM) chatbots to support patient self-management and education in rheumatology. Ten disease-specific chatbots based on German guidelines w...

Tim Wilhelmi, Vanessa Bartsch, Marius Platt et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Real-world use and evaluation of a generative AI chatbot for Parkinson's disease information: a prospective observational study

Summary Background Patient-facing medical AI chatbots are entering clinical use faster than evidence can characterise their real-world safety. We evaluated one deployed system and introduce CARE-LLM, a proposed framework for conversation-level post-market surveillance. Methods We conducted a prospective, observational,...

Florian Lange, Ssaman Mardi, T. Binder et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions

Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used to answer clinical questions with citations to relevant studies, yet the quality of retrieved evidence and factors influencing study selection remain unclear. We evaluated three general-purpose LLM chatbots (Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and ChatGPT GPT-5.5)...

Qingfang Liu, Qiao Jin, J. Menke et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Multilingual Conversational AI Chatbots for Efficient Healthcare Delivery During Case History-Taking: A Systematic Review

Multilingual AI chatbots demonstrate a boost in healthcare efficiency, a reduction in language barriers, and the promotion of health equity, but exhibit challenges regarding validation, workflow integration, and evaluation standards, along with ethical issues such as privacy and bias.

R. Sharanesha, Deepti Virupakshappa, A. Abushanan et al. · 0 citations
Review 2026

The Use of Large Language Model Chatbots for the Promotion of Physical Activity: A Scoping Review

Physical inactivity is a critical challenge to global public health. Large language model (LLM) chatbots represent a paradigm shift in conversational agents, offering unprecedented capabilities for dynamic, personalized dialogue. The purpose of this scoping review is to map use of LLM chatbots for physical activity pro...

Gary Rodgers, M. R. Sweeney, Anthony Staines et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.